--On Tuesday, January 11, 2005 21:55:45 -0700 Dwight Tovey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> Frank Smith said:
>> --On Tuesday, January 11, 2005 18:12:55 -0700 Dwight Tovey
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>
>> Are you sure your index files are good? Do the files look like:
>> /somedir/file1
>>
Frank Smith said:
> --On Tuesday, January 11, 2005 18:12:55 -0700 Dwight Tovey
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Are you sure your index files are good? Do the files look like:
> /somedir/file1
>
> or is it more like:
>
> 8945983969/somedir/file1
>
>
> If your index files contain the large random
--On Tuesday, January 11, 2005 18:12:55 -0700 Dwight Tovey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hello all -
>
> I've recently started using Amanda for my backup strategy, and I'm having
> a problem with amrecover.
>
> I set up my tape/index server on a RH 7.3 system with a 20G holding disk
> and a 4mm
On Tuesday 11 January 2005 16:40, Jon LaBadie wrote:
>On Tue, Jan 11, 2005 at 03:40:47PM -0500, Brian Cuttler wrote:
>> Amanda user list,
>>
>> I've spoken to Harry at Condre systems and he confirmed what we
>> where seeing. The jukebox robot is a narrow bus so that are two
>> changes we need to ma
Hello all -
I've recently started using Amanda for my backup strategy, and I'm having
a problem with amrecover.
I set up my tape/index server on a RH 7.3 system with a 20G holding disk
and a 4mm DAT drive (DDS-2). Backing up the server itself seemed to be
working, so I next added a client system
Jon,
Recommended buying an additional scsi card more than once to the
system's owners, haven't made the case yet (maybe now). I would
really have liked the raid array on a separate bus from the tape
drives.
I have to trust that the proper cabeling to terminate the additional
lines is present in
On Tue, Jan 11, 2005 at 03:40:47PM -0500, Brian Cuttler wrote:
>
> Amanda user list,
>
> I've spoken to Harry at Condre systems and he confirmed what we
> where seeing. The jukebox robot is a narrow bus so that are two
> changes we need to make.
>
> 1) We want to move the jukebox/SDLT to be the
Amanda user list,
I've spoken to Harry at Condre systems and he confirmed what we
where seeing. The jukebox robot is a narrow bus so that are two
changes we need to make.
1) We want to move the jukebox/SDLT to be the last device on
the daisy chain.
2) We want to terminate the jukebox-robot,
Jason Davis wrote:
Hello,
I have installed amanda-client on a Debian box via apt.
I have this entry in /etc/inetd.conf
amanda dgram udp wait backup /usr/sbin/tcpd /usr/lib/amanda/amandad
however , when I restart inetd and run netstat -tap I do not see
any amanda daemons listening. Anyone know what
Hello,
I have installed amanda-client on a Debian box via apt.
I have this entry in /etc/inetd.conf
amanda dgram udp wait backup /usr/sbin/tcpd /usr/lib/amanda/amandad
however , when I restart inetd and run netstat -tap I do not see
any amanda daemons listening. Anyone know what I am doing wrong
On Tuesday 11 January 2005 09:16, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
>Hi,
>
>on Dienstag, 11. Jänner 2005 at 15:12 I wrote to amanda-users:
>
>SGW> There has been a thread lately in which Gene Heskett described
> how to SGW> do that. I paste the relevant part in here:
>
>Forgot to note that I think this p
On Tuesday 11 January 2005 09:12, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
>Hi, Sandra,
>
>on Dienstag, 11. Jänner 2005 at 14:50 you wrote to amanda-users
>
>(in english, obwohl wir beide Deutsch schreiben könnten, aber dann
>versteht hier keiner was ;-) ):
>
>SKsdd> Hi Stefan,
>
>SKsdd> errrm, stupid and confu
On Tue, Jan 11, 2005 at 09:11:31AM +0100, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> The minimum blocksize value
> is 32 KBytes. The maximum blocksize value is 32
> KBytes.
The man pages have configure variables, which are expanded
during "make". Presumably the
Gil Naveh wrote:
Hello, I am quit new with Amanda and I don’t understand an important
concept regarding Amanda.
I realize that Amanda decides what type of backup to perform (level 0 ,
level 1 etc) according to its algorithm.
However, how does it knows which backup level to perform when a user
On Tue, Jan 11, 2005 at 11:11:06AM -0600, Gil Naveh wrote:
> Hello, I am quit new with Amanda and I don't understand an important concept
> regarding Amanda.
>
> I realize that Amanda decides what type of backup to perform (level 0 ,
> level 1 etc) according to its algorithm.
>
> However, how doe
Hello, I am quit new with Amanda and I don’t understand an
important concept regarding Amanda.
I realize that Amanda decides what type of backup to perform (level 0 ,
level 1 etc) according to its algorithm.
However, how does it knows which backup level to perform when a user
have a tape
Hi, Paul,
on Dienstag, 11. Jänner 2005 at 16:02 you wrote to amanda-users:
>> Is it possible? I heard that recent versions of Samba accept
>> share/directory names with spaces. What about Amanda?
>> If it must be hacked, could anybody point me where to start?
PB> Two possibilities; both not very
Filip Rembiałkowski wrote:
I've started using Amanda instead of prioprietary software to backup
whole NT domain.
I'd like to have disklist entries with spaces, like:
smbhost"//WKS001/C$/Program Files/Filthy App"nocomp-user-smbtar
Is it possible? I heard that recent versions of Samba accep
Hello,
I've started using Amanda instead of prioprietary software to backup
whole NT domain.
I'd like to have disklist entries with spaces, like:
smbhost"//WKS001/C$/Program Files/Filthy App"nocomp-user-smbtar
Is it possible? I heard that recent versions of Samba accept
share/directory n
Hi,
on Dienstag, 11. Jänner 2005 at 15:12 I wrote to amanda-users:
SGW> There has been a thread lately in which Gene Heskett described how to
SGW> do that. I paste the relevant part in here:
Forgot to note that I think this procedure should go into the docs
somewhere. Needs some general re-writi
Hi, Sandra,
on Dienstag, 11. Jänner 2005 at 14:50 you wrote to amanda-users
(in english, obwohl wir beide Deutsch schreiben könnten, aber dann
versteht hier keiner was ;-) ):
SKsdd> Hi Stefan,
SKsdd> errrm, stupid and confused as I was I actually changed
SKsdd> it to 32 bytes (!), but now I cor
Hi Stefan,
errrm, stupid and confused as I was
I actually changed it to 32 bytes (!), but now I corrected it, setting
a value of 32768.
Sorry for messing this up. I now started
a new try with this setting. My fault, that I didn´t made a written notice
when I changed the blocksize on the old mach
Hi, Paul,
on Dienstag, 11. Jänner 2005 at 14:14 you wrote to amanda-users:
>> These problems I had resolved by using fresh tapes and by setting the
>> default block size of the tape device to 32, which was the original
>> setting.
PB> blocksize of 32 bytes? Or do you mean 32 Kbytes?
PB> If the
Hi Paul,
no, no. 32 Kbytes of course not 32 bytes.
I am using a Compaq 40/80 DLT drive
and as far as I can remember I had to do this setting to get the whole
thing working.
Kind regards
Sandra Krumme
Paul Bijnens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
11.01.2005 14:14
An
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Kopie
am
Hi,
this is what /var/log/messages tells
me:
Jan 11 12:20:41 XX kernel: application
bug: dumper(20882) has SIGCHLD set t
o SIG_IGN but calls wait().
Jan 11 12:20:41 XX kernel: (see
the NOTES section of 'man 2 wait'). Workaro
und activated.
Jan 11 12:22:16 XX kernel: application
bug
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
after moving my backup hard- and software to another machine, I
encountered several problems. One was due to faulty tapes, the other due
to the fact that I didn´t knew the blocksize I set the tape device on
the old machine.
These problems I had resolved by using fresh ta
Hi, [EMAIL PROTECTED],
on Dienstag, 11. Jänner 2005 at 13:41 you wrote to amanda-users:
SKsdd> Now my backup is up an running again. But when I start
SKsdd> amdump, the filesystems are dumped quickly as usual, but when
SKsdd> the taper starts writing it takes extremly long.
SKsdd> Here is an exam
Hi all,
after moving my backup hard- and software
to another machine, I encountered several problems. One was due to faulty
tapes, the other due to the fact that I didn´t knew the blocksize I set
the tape device on the old machine.
These problems I had resolved by using
fresh tapes and by setting
On Mon, 10 Jan 2005, Eric Siegerman wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 10, 2005 at 02:47:43PM -0700, Jason Davis wrote:
> > tar: ./2005-01-07_17-00-57/ibdata01.ibz: implausibly old time stamp
> > 1969-12-31 17:00:00
>
> For some reason, tar thinks the file's timestamp is 0, or else
> the timestamp recorded in t
Hi, Jon,
on Montag, 10. Jänner 2005 at 22:19 you wrote to amanda-users:
JL> In recent versions, amanda can work with blocksizes other than 32k.
JL> I forget if it is a configure option needed during the build or
JL> a parameter that can be set in amanda.conf. I've never used it.
The parameter b
30 matches
Mail list logo
