Hello,
This DLE:
amandahost //NTSERVER/D$/important.bkf nocomp-user-gnutar
expands to whole D$ volume while estimating and dumping. Surprise for me.
Is there any way to create a single-file DLE while using Samba?
TIA,
--
Filip Rembiakowski
Hi,
your exclude-list has wrong syntax.
it has to be relative to the root of the filesystem you backup.
it should read like this
./media
./tmp
./var/spool/postfix
Christoph
Nick Danger schrieb:
[snip]
Oddly, the sendbackup...exclude tells it to exclude the
/var/spool/postfix so Im not sure they
Hello,
I'm new in that list, and I'm looking for a good
backup system for my net, with windows clients, I need
to back up files although if they are open and been
used by the user. It's possible with Amanda?
Thanks
__
Renovamos el
Gene Heskett schrieb:
On Thursday 27 January 2005 03:48, Christoph Scheeder wrote:
Hi,
your exclude-list has wrong syntax.
it has to be relative to the root of the filesystem you backup.
it should read like this
./media
./tmp
./var/spool/postfix
Actually, I don't think the last line is correct
Filip Rembiakowski wrote:
This DLE:
amandahost //NTSERVER/D$/important.bkf nocomp-user-gnutar
expands to whole D$ volume while estimating and dumping. Surprise for me.
Is there any way to create a single-file DLE while using Samba?
Not that I know. There is a trick with gnutar and includes, but
Leire Cristobo wrote:
Hello,
I'm new in that list, and I'm looking for a good
backup system for my net, with windows clients, I need
to back up files although if they are open and been
used by the user. It's possible with Amanda?
No.
It not even possible with the standard Microsoft Windows
Dnia 2005-01-27 11:10, Paul Bijnens napisa:
Filip Rembiakowski wrote:
This DLE:
amandahost //NTSERVER/D$/important.bkf nocomp-user-gnutar
expands to whole D$ volume while estimating and dumping. Surprise
for me.
Is there any way to create a single-file DLE while using Samba?
Not that I know.
As an aside, it's considered bad from to respond to a list email
(and then change the subject) when starting a new thread. Your question
gets buried in an unrelated thread (for those of us using threaded mail
readers) which a) annoys people, and b) makes it less likely to get
answered.
--
On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 at 4:27pm, Nina Pham wrote
The files we are backing up are resigned on more than 1 servers, and we
want to store that archive on the same place. Therefore we need to mount.
As other folks have mentioned, no, you don't. However, what I haven't
seen clarified yet is what
Actually, if it's on a windows 2003 server it is possible with the
standard Microsoft Windows Backup, as the Windows 2003 version of
NTBACKUP will use shadow copies to do the backup. Any other Windows
OS (XP, 2000, etc...) it is not standard.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
hi,
it would be nice if amanda will be packaged with a compiled in wrapper tar
script instead of running tar from /usr/bin. perhaps it's possible to run
/usr/lib/amanda/tar-wrapper wich is calling /usr/bin/tar again. that
script could be changed then to call /usr/bin/star.
regards
claus
hi,
as the response at this mailinglist i set up a script now which do some
pre stuff then start the backup and do some post stuff after the backup.
but the besser way would be an integration of these scripts into the
backup process because the logfiles will be at one single place.
the solution
On Thursday 27 January 2005 08:54, Claus Rosenberger wrote:
hi,
it would be nice if amanda will be packaged with a compiled in
wrapper tar script instead of running tar from /usr/bin. perhaps
it's possible to run /usr/lib/amanda/tar-wrapper wich is calling
/usr/bin/tar again. that script could
On Thursday 27 January 2005 08:59, Claus Rosenberger wrote:
hi,
as the response at this mailinglist i set up a script now which do
some pre stuff then start the backup and do some post stuff after
the backup. but the besser way would be an integration of these
scripts into the backup process
it would be nice if amanda will be packaged with a compiled in
wrapper tar script instead of running tar from /usr/bin. perhaps
it's possible to run /usr/lib/amanda/tar-wrapper wich is calling
/usr/bin/tar again. that script could be changed then to call
/usr/bin/star.
If building it from
I've found its best to do the pre and post stuff seperate from amanda,
as when amanda is running, it has a few file locks and those files
cannot be backed up by amanda so you lose the most vital info of the
backup, what is it and where is it. My method works without this
limitation. In my
On Thu, Jan 27, 2005 at 05:42:27PM +0100, Claus Rosenberger enlightened us:
it would be nice if amanda will be packaged with a compiled in
wrapper tar script instead of running tar from /usr/bin. perhaps
it's possible to run /usr/lib/amanda/tar-wrapper wich is calling
/usr/bin/tar again.
I don't know about .debs, but with .rpms I can rebuild the source RPM
after
modifying the spec file so I get the best of both worlds...customized
build
and package management.
it's the same with debs. only use apt-get source amanda and the
dpkg-buildpackage with changed configure settings
On Thu, Jan 27, 2005 at 06:08:01PM +0100, Sebastian Kösters wrote:
if I want to restore a
tape/backup older than the last one this fails. Iam only able to restore
the last Backup from tape. I wanted to use the same amlabel for every Sunday
because I dont want the tapelist file become that
Hi, Eric,
on Donnerstag, 27. Jänner 2005 at 18:23 you wrote to amanda-users:
ES DON'T DON'T DON'T give all your tapes the same label!
In once had a customer who ran amlabel as part of his daily
backup-procedure.
Change tape, run amlabel -f ..., wait for cronjob ... everyday.
And he wondered
Dear Ladies and Gentlemen,
In July 1999 we bought a Qualstar lib TLS-4220 with one AIT-2 Tape
Drive LVD. Until mid of last year we have operated this lib successfully
on a Solaris 7 platform with the Legato Networker 5.5 software.
Last year we have updated the system from AIT-2 to AIT-3 by
On Thu, Jan 27, 2005 at 07:01:31AM -0500, Joshua Baker-LePain wrote:
On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 at 4:27pm, Nina Pham wrote
The files we are backing up are resigned on more than 1 servers, and we
want to store that archive on the same place. Therefore we need to mount.
As other folks have
--On Thursday, January 27, 2005 19:32:42 +0100 Franz-Heinrich Massmann [EMAIL
PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear Ladies and Gentlemen,
In July 1999 we bought a Qualstar lib TLS-4220 with one AIT-2 Tape
Drive LVD. Until mid of last year we have operated this lib successfully
on a Solaris 7 platform
Thanks folks. Now I need to learn how to configure run amanda client.
Thanks again.
Mike Delaney wrote:
On Thu, Jan 27, 2005 at 07:01:31AM -0500, Joshua Baker-LePain wrote:
On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 at 4:27pm, Nina Pham wrote
The files we are backing up are resigned on more than 1 servers, and
On Thursday 27 January 2005 13:20, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
Hi, Eric,
on Donnerstag, 27. Jänner 2005 at 18:23 you wrote to amanda-users:
ES DON'T DON'T DON'T give all your tapes the same label!
In once had a customer who ran amlabel as part of his daily
backup-procedure.
Change tape, run
Hello, Gene,
just now (on 01/27/2005 at 20:58) you wrote:
GH I do hope he was able to find gainfull employment, hopefully not
GH around computers?
Errm, AFAIK he is some kind of admin for this, errm, big institution
...
It's always fun to see what jobs I could have ...
--
Bye,
Stefan
On Thursday 27 January 2005 14:59, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
Hello, Gene,
just now (on 01/27/2005 at 20:58) you wrote:
GH I do hope he was able to find gainfull employment, hopefully not
GH around computers?
Errm, AFAIK he is some kind of admin for this, errm, big institution
Hoo boy, this
Kevin Dalley wrote:
I used amrestore to recover a file and received error message which
look like this:
Extracting from file /backup/20050125170301/condor._.5
tar: ./var/cache/apt/pkgcache.bin: invalid sparse archive member
tar: Skipping to next header
tar: Archive contains obsolescent base-64
Oops. I forgot to mention the version number
I am using a CVS release of amanda, which is named Amanda-2.4.5b1,
with CVS date as of about Thu Nov 18 16:50:15 PST 2004 using tag
amanda-245-branch, with an additional change which I made regarding
the , which is probably unrelated to the problem at
Kevin Dalley wrote:
Oops. I forgot to mention the version number
I am using a CVS release of amanda, which is named Amanda-2.4.5b1,
should be fine, but...
Kevin Dalley wrote:
Last night, my amanda run had a problem. The partition on which
infofile is stored ran out of space. With infofile set
Paul Bijnens [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Kevin Dalley wrote:
Oops. I forgot to mention the version number
I am using a CVS release of amanda, which is named Amanda-2.4.5b1,
should be fine, but...
Kevin Dalley wrote:
Last night, my amanda run had a problem. The partition on which
infofile
On Thu, Jan 27, 2005 at 02:54:34PM +0100, Claus Rosenberger wrote:
hi,
it would be nice if amanda will be packaged with a compiled in wrapper tar
script instead of running tar from /usr/bin. perhaps it's possible to run
/usr/lib/amanda/tar-wrapper wich is calling /usr/bin/tar again. that
Related to your original post on the subject, it was suggested that
you see if star supported all the arguments and options that amanda
expected to see supported by gnutar and if it was compatible with
the formats and error messages that gnutar generates. Were you
able to do that? If star
33 matches
Mail list logo
