On Tue, Feb 01, 2005 at 11:42:19PM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Tuesday 01 February 2005 18:42, Tom Simons wrote:
> >Can/should Amanda use an Iomeg REV drive as an output tape?
> >
> >We've got 2 servers both running RedHat AS 3.0, with 35gb & 70gb
> > hard drives on each, and we're intersted in
On Wed, 2 Feb 2005, Mike Delaney wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 01, 2005 at 11:42:19PM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > Whats the rated read/write speeds on that drive Tom? For amanda to be
> > useable, it needs to be able to do a more or less normal backup in
> > not more than 3-4 hours total elapsed time.
I am testing a new version of amanda before putting it into play here at
work. The old version was 2.4.2p2. I can do the backups fine (I think),
but when I try to check them with amrecover, I get the following error:
morimoto:/usr/local/src/amanda-2.4.4p4/sbin# ./amrecover -C Progeny01
AMRECOVER V
--
Kind Regards,
Gavin Henry.
Managing Director.
T +44 (0) 1467 624141
M +44 (0) 7930 323266
F +44 (0) 1224 742001
E [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Open Source. Open Solutions(tm).
http://www.suretecsystems.com/
> morimoto:/usr/local/src/amanda-2.4.4p4/sbin# ./amrecover -C Progeny01
AMRECOVER Version 2.4
On Wednesday 02 February 2005 04:12, Mike Delaney wrote:
[...]
>> >Has anyone used a REV drive with Amanda?
>>
>> I can imagine that it may be possible, with some variation of the
>> FILE: device, and as Jon mentioned, they have a 10 disk changer
>> available which to me, would make it *much* more
On Wed, Feb 02, 2005 at 10:43:50AM -0500, Gene Heskett enlightened us:
> I don't *think* the FILE: driver has made it to the 2.4.4 release yet,
> but Jean-Louis can straigthen me out if it has. I've been using the
> 2.4.5 stuff almost since it was first added to the snapshot
> repository with o
Hi Everyone.
I am having some touble doing a restore from a client. I backed up
/root on a remote debian box as a test, and it was a success. When I
login to the remote debian box, and try to do a amrecover, the client
says:
AMRECOVER Version 2.4.3. Contacting server on
...
amrecover: can
On Wed, Feb 02, 2005 at 08:13:06AM -0800, Steve H wrote:
> What I am confused about, is the client thinking itself is the server.
One way to change this is "amrecover -s -t ".
Maybe the default can be changed by an option to configure; not
sure about that.
--
| | /\
|-_|/ > Eric Siegerman,
> Hi Everyone.
>I am having some touble doing a restore from a client. I backed up
> /root on a remote debian box as a test, and it was a success. When I
> login to the remote debian box, and try to do a amrecover, the client
> says:
>
> AMRECOVER Version 2.4.3. Contacting server on
> ...
>
On Wednesday 02 February 2005 11:03, Matt Hyclak wrote:
>On Wed, Feb 02, 2005 at 10:43:50AM -0500, Gene Heskett enlightened
us:
>> I don't *think* the FILE: driver has made it to the 2.4.4 release
>> yet, but Jean-Louis can straigthen me out if it has. I've been
>> using the 2.4.5 stuff almost si
On Wed, 2005-02-02 at 15:38 +, Gavin Henry wrote:
> --
> Kind Regards,
>
> Gavin Henry.
> Managing Director.
>
> T +44 (0) 1467 624141
> M +44 (0) 7930 323266
> F +44 (0) 1224 742001
> E [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Open Source. Open Solutions(tm).
>
> http://www.suretecsystems.com/
>
> > morimo
Kevin Alford started a thread about losing his amanda server
crashing, needing to rebuild it, not having indexes and
needing to do a restore. The system details pre-crash were
Amanda 2.4.2p2 on AIX 5.1 ML6
When Kevin wasn't getting very far I started an email dialog
with him, but we have hit a st
On Wed, Feb 02, 2005 at 01:44:47PM +1100, Jamie Wilkinson wrote:
> This one time, at band camp, Paul Bijnens wrote:
> >Eric Dantan Rzewnicki wrote:
> >>what are some good options for long term archival storage?
> >Someone stole my crystal ball...
> Or did he mean "amanda.conf options" ?
I was inqu
Hopefully there are some other people on the list with AIX 5 experience,
mine stops at AIX 4.
Yes, backup is the AIX name for dump, it is a block level backup
utility rather than file level. One of its features is the
ability to backup by file name or by i-node, but most other versions
of dump ca
I finally have time to work on this new tape drive (vxa-2-packet-loader). I am having difficulty since this is my first autoload-type system. I have amanda running fine for years with a single manually-loaded tape drive. Here are a few questions:
1) it appears that I must get mtx to respond
Eric,
Thanks, That worked great. Now I am having a different problem. When I go
into the restore menu:
As a test, I backed up the /root directory. Now, when I do a setdisk /root
/root/.restore it doesn't have any files available to add to the extract list.
I created the .restore director
On Wed, Feb 02, 2005 at 10:43:50AM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Wednesday 02 February 2005 04:12, Mike Delaney wrote:
> [...]
> >> >Has anyone used a REV drive with Amanda?
> >>
> >> I can imagine that it may be possible, with some variation of the
> >> FILE: device, and as Jon mentioned, they h
On Wed, 2 Feb 2005, Mike Delaney wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 02, 2005 at 10:43:50AM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > On Wednesday 02 February 2005 04:12, Mike Delaney wrote:
> > [...]
> > >> >Has anyone used a REV drive with Amanda?
> > >>
> > >> I can imagine that it may be possible, with some variation of
Progress.
My main problem was the library is at sg3 not sg6. sg6 is the tape drive...duh !
My next problem was that the scsi driver for the symbios scsi card did not work correctly on this alpha/linux server. I was using the newer -2 driver, but now reverting back to the ncr driver. I migh
On Wednesday 02 February 2005 12:20, Jon LaBadie wrote:
>Kevin Alford started a thread about losing his amanda server
>crashing, needing to rebuild it, not having indexes and
>needing to do a restore. The system details pre-crash were
>Amanda 2.4.2p2 on AIX 5.1 ML6
>
>When Kevin wasn't getting ver
20 matches
Mail list logo
