Am Mittwoch, 16. MÃrz 2005 10:09 schrieb Sven Rudolph:
> Heiko Schellhorn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I have following Problem using chg-scsi.
> >
> > runing chg-scsi -info I get the message
> > "Can't read STE status"
>
> I had such problems in 2003 and discussed them with the chg-scsi
> autho
Steve Wray wrote:
Peter Kunst wrote:
Hi Steve,
Steve Wray wrote:
Gaby vanhegan wrote:
Hello again!
Whilst setting up a full dump configuration to do monthly full dumps
to tape, I'm torn between either:
strategy "noinc"
or
dumpcycle 0
To do a full dump. What's the difference here? Does i
Peter Kunst wrote:
Hi Steve,
Steve Wray wrote:
Gaby vanhegan wrote:
Hello again!
Whilst setting up a full dump configuration to do monthly full dumps
to tape, I'm torn between either:
strategy "noinc"
or
dumpcycle 0
To do a full dump. What's the difference here? Does it matter which
on
Hi Steve,
Steve Wray wrote:
Gaby vanhegan wrote:
Hello again!
Whilst setting up a full dump configuration to do monthly full dumps
to tape, I'm torn between either:
strategy "noinc"
or
dumpcycle 0
To do a full dump. What's the difference here? Does it matter which
one I use?
Heres my
Gaby vanhegan wrote:
Hello again!
Whilst setting up a full dump configuration to do monthly full dumps to
tape, I'm torn between either:
strategy "noinc"
or
dumpcycle 0
To do a full dump. What's the difference here? Does it matter which
one I use?
Heres my reading of what I've experien
On Wednesday 16 March 2005 14:12, John Stange wrote:
>Been taking a look at amverify, having been asked to make it
> cooperate with the spanning tape patch. The thing that causes it
> to not work, however, brings up something of a dilemma...
>
>amverify invokes amrestore on a set of tapes, checkin
Hi:
That's exactly what I have in inetd.conf, if I typed it from command
line, it would sit there for 30 seconds and stop and create a log file
at /tmp/amanda - amandad.20050316134621.debug.
Here are last few lines of this log file -
time 30.007: dgram_recv: timeout after 30 seconds
amandad: er
Kevin Chen wrote:
Greetings:
I am setting up Amanda 2.4.4p4 on a Sun Ultra30 machine which is
running Solaris 8, configuration and make install went through all
right, but when I run "amcheck Daily", it is keep on complaining
about one of client host is down - "Warning: spain selfcheck request
t
Try # ldd /usr/local/libexec/amandad on the client and see
if you don't have all the support libraries available.
On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 12:43:07PM -0800, Kevin Chen wrote:
> Greetings:
>
>
>
> I am setting up Amanda 2.4.4p4 on a Sun Ultra30 machine which is
>
> running Solaris 8, configu
Greetings:
I am setting up Amanda 2.4.4p4 on a Sun Ultra30 machine which is
running Solaris 8, configuration and make install went through all
right, but when I run "amcheck Daily", it is keep on
complaining
about one of client host is down - "Warning: spain
selfcheck request
ti
On Wednesday 16 March 2005 13:06, Edson Noboru Yamada wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I´m a Veritas Netbackup admin, and I´m trying to test Amanda
>as an alternative.
>
>With Netbackup, it´s possible to define a backup image retention
> time, that is the number of days that an a given image must be
> preserved on a
On Wednesday 16 March 2005 09:43, Vicki Stanfield wrote:
>I have noticed that two large files which are of type GNU tar
> archive and named in the format:
> hostname._net_hostname_home_user.20041221.2 (exactly matches an
> entry in disklist except that the slashes in the path are now
> underscores
--On Wednesday, March 16, 2005 15:39:37 -0300 Edson Noboru Yamada <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Suppose I want to perform one full backup per week, and one day is time
> enough to do that for all the clients. All the images fit in 2 tapes.
>
> I defined the following parameters:
>
> dumpc
Quoting Paul Bijnens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Matt Lung wrote:
> > I've been getting an error on one of my backup jobs lately that I hope
> someone
> > else can help me with. The host I am getting the errror on is a windows
> host
> > being contacted vi smbaclient. When an amcheck is run before th
> tapecycle?
> Probably not exactly the same semantics but close enough: it is
> counted in number of tapes instead of days (but together with
> runspercycle and runtapes this becomes equivalent).
> Also amanda will warn a few days in advance when you would overwrite
> the last full dump of disk-
On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 at 3:06pm, Edson Noboru Yamada wrote
> I´m a Veritas Netbackup admin, and I´m trying to test Amanda
> as an alternative.
>
> With Netbackup, it´s possible to define a backup image retention time, that
> is the number of days that an a given image must be preserved on a tape;
Edson Noboru Yamada wrote:
With Netbackup, it´s possible to define a backup image retention time, that
is the number of days that an a given image must be preserved on a tape; a tape
is only reused if all the backup images it contains are expired.
Is there a way to define something similar with a
Matt Lung wrote:
I've been getting an error on one of my backup jobs lately that I hope someone
else can help me with. The host I am getting the errror on is a windows host
being contacted vi smbaclient. When an amcheck is run before the backup job, I
get no errors. All hosts are up, running, an
Steve Wray wrote:
Looking at the /tmp/amanda/ logfiles on the client in question, I find
something I've not seen before.
Any ideas would be appreciated!
Thanks
[snip]
got packet:
Amanda 2.4 REQ HANDLE 004-B0080708 SEQ 1110921966
SECURITY USER backup
SERVICE noop
OPTIONS features=feff
Hi,
I´m a Veritas Netbackup admin, and I´m trying to test Amanda
as an alternative.
With Netbackup, it´s possible to define a backup image retention time, that
is the number of days that an a given image must be preserved on a tape; a tape
is only reused if all the backup images it contains are
Vicki Stanfield wrote:
I have noticed that two large files which are of type GNU tar archive
and named in the format: hostname._net_hostname_home_user.20041221.2
(exactly matches an entry in disklist except that the slashes in the
path are now underscores and the date and another number are appende
On 16 Mar 2005, at 13:26, Jon LaBadie wrote:
With dumpcycle 0, each DLE is scheduled for a level 0 each run of
amdump.
With "noinc", incrementals are scheduled and planned, just not done.
I.e. for a particular amdump run, nothing is done with that DLE if it
is
scheduled for an incremental.
So, t
On 16 Mar 2005, at 13:15, Jon LaBadie wrote:
On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 12:53:02PM +, Gaby vanhegan wrote:
Hello!
Is there any reason why I would not want to set autoflush to "yes" in
amanda.conf? I have plenty of space on my tapes (40gb tapes, usually
2-5gb backups) and as far as I can see this
Hi Vicki,
I'm not sure about why the file's there, but the timestamp on the end of
that file seems very old (21 Dec 2004). Is it possible that file was
left over from a previous test of disk-tapes?
Thanks,
Mark Lidstone
IT and Network Support Administrator
BMT SeaTech Ltd
Grove House, Meridian
I have noticed that two large files which are of type GNU tar archive
and named in the format: hostname._net_hostname_home_user.20041221.2
(exactly matches an entry in disklist except that the slashes in the
path are now underscores and the date and another number are appended)
I assume that Amand
I've been getting an error on one of my backup jobs lately that I hope someone
else can help me with. The host I am getting the errror on is a windows host
being contacted vi smbaclient. When an amcheck is run before the backup job, I
get no errors. All hosts are up, running, and can be contacte
On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 08:27:51AM -0500, Brian Cuttler wrote:
>
> Will Amanda use any tape that is more than tapecycle entries down
> the list or only the one of the bottom ?
>
> On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 11:52:01PM +0100, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> > Hi, Tom,
> >
> > on Dienstag, 15. März 200
Will Amanda use any tape that is more than tapecycle entries down
the list or only the one of the bottom ?
On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 11:52:01PM +0100, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> Hi, Tom,
>
> on Dienstag, 15. März 2005 at 23:32 you wrote to amanda-users:
>
> TS> On Tue, 2005-03-15 at 10:25 -070
On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 12:57:22PM +, Gaby vanhegan wrote:
> Hello again!
>
> Whilst setting up a full dump configuration to do monthly full dumps to
> tape, I'm torn between either:
>
> strategy "noinc"
>
> or
>
> dumpcycle 0
>
> To do a full dump. What's the difference here
On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 12:53:02PM +, Gaby vanhegan wrote:
> Hello!
>
> Is there any reason why I would not want to set autoflush to "yes" in
> amanda.conf? I have plenty of space on my tapes (40gb tapes, usually
> 2-5gb backups) and as far as I can see this will simply lower the
> amount
Hello again!
Whilst setting up a full dump configuration to do monthly full dumps to
tape, I'm torn between either:
strategy "noinc"
or
dumpcycle 0
To do a full dump. What's the difference here? Does it matter which
one I use?
Gaby
--
Uganda Maximum - Enemy of the English Thru
Hello!
Is there any reason why I would not want to set autoflush to "yes" in
amanda.conf? I have plenty of space on my tapes (40gb tapes, usually
2-5gb backups) and as far as I can see this will simply lower the
amount of admin I have to do?
Gaby
--
Uganda Maximum - Enemy of the English Thrust
Heiko Schellhorn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have following Problem using chg-scsi.
>
> runing chg-scsi -info I get the message
> "Can't read STE status"
I had such problems in 2003 and discussed them with the chg-scsi
author. He provided a patch that worked better, but the problem
reappeare
Hi everybody
I have following Problem using chg-scsi.
runing chg-scsi -info I get the message
"Can't read STE status"
Using google I didn't find any helpful answers for the problem.
There's also no explanation for this error-message.
Has somebody had the same problem ? And how did you solve it.
34 matches
Mail list logo
