Toomas Aas wrote:
Ryan Pagquil wrote:
another question, why does amstatus reports that some dumps are not
successful and giving this reasons:
0 driver: (aborted:could not connect to data port: Connection
timed out)(too many dumper retry)
1 driver: (aborted:[request timeout])(too ma
On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 11:53:57PM +0200, Vlad Popa wrote:
> Hello Jon !
>
> Jon LaBadie schrieb:
>
> >On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 12:05:21PM +0200, Vlad Popa wrote:
>
> >I'll ask Paul's question slightly differently.
> >How can you WANT to run any slower (see below).
> >
>
> >>DUMP SUMMARY:
> >>
Eric Dantan Rzewnicki schrieb:
On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 11:53:57PM +0200, Vlad Popa wrote:
Hello Jon !
Jon LaBadie schrieb:
On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 12:05:21PM +0200, Vlad Popa wrote:
Dear Paul,
Paul Bijnens schrieb:
Vlad Popa wrote:
So how can I say "Not so
On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 11:53:57PM +0200, Vlad Popa wrote:
> Hello Jon !
> Jon LaBadie schrieb:
> >On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 12:05:21PM +0200, Vlad Popa wrote:
> >>Dear Paul,
> >>Paul Bijnens schrieb:
> >>>Vlad Popa wrote:
> So how can I say "Not so fast, Mrs. Amanda !" when taping ?
> >>>Are you
Hello Jon !
Jon LaBadie schrieb:
On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 12:05:21PM +0200, Vlad Popa wrote:
Dear Paul,
Paul Bijnens schrieb:
Vlad Popa wrote:
So how can I say "Not so fast, Mrs. Amanda !" when taping ?
Are you 100% sure that is the problem??
I'll a
Ryan Pagquil wrote:
another question, why does amstatus reports that some dumps are not
successful and giving this reasons:
0 driver: (aborted:could not connect to data port: Connection
timed out)(too many dumper retry)
1 driver: (aborted:[request timeout])(too many dumper retry)
bu
Dnia 05/24/05 18:05, Tom Brown napisaĆ:
I tried this:
--- client-src/sendbackup-gnutar.c.orig 2005-05-20 12:46:49.0
+0200
+++ client-src/sendbackup-gnutar.c 2005-05-20 12:31:03.0
+0200
@@ -73,6 +73,7 @@
AM_NORMAL_RE("^[Aa]dded interface"),
AM_NORMAL_RE("^session r
On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 03:13:13PM +0800, Ryan Pagquil wrote:
> Jon LaBadie wrote:
> >On Sat, May 21, 2005 at 02:23:21PM +0800, Ryan Pagquil wrote:
> >>Guys,
> >> Who will be the responsible for the dump when the amanda said that
> >>the host's status is "wait for dumping"?
> >If I understand cor
I tried this:
--- client-src/sendbackup-gnutar.c.orig 2005-05-20 12:46:49.0 +0200
+++ client-src/sendbackup-gnutar.c 2005-05-20 12:31:03.0 +0200
@@ -73,6 +73,7 @@
AM_NORMAL_RE("^[Aa]dded interface"),
AM_NORMAL_RE("^session request to "),
AM_NORMAL_RE("^tar: dumped
On Mon, 23 May 2005, Paul Bijnens wrote:
> Steven Backus wrote:
> > I changed my OS from Red Hat 8 to AS 3.1 and now amanda gives me
> > this errror. I upgraded to the latest release, 2.4.5, but it
> > didn't help. Nothing in the /tmp/amanda directory helps, amcheck
> > runs fine. Does anyone h
Hopefully this will be useful to someone.
==
Notes:
- the name of the AMANDA server is 'blather'
- You may (or may not) need to label the tape before
running 'amtapetype' (I did the first time I used
the tape).
- Rebooting causes the drive to
Iulian Topliceanu schrieb:
Hi,
After upgrading a client to amanda 2.4.5 on a RH9 the following problem
has occured:
I have 115 DLE for that client, and since upgrading, 14 volumes faile
to be backuped. The *same* 14 volumes.
I'm getting this:
FAILURE AND STRANGE DUMP SUMMARY:
planner:
Hi,
After upgrading a client to amanda 2.4.5 on a RH9 the following problem
has occured:
I have 115 DLE for that client, and since upgrading, 14 volumes faile
to be backuped. The *same* 14 volumes.
I'm getting this:
FAILURE AND STRANGE DUMP SUMMARY:
planner: ERROR Request to client time
Ryan Pagquil wrote:
Jon LaBadie wrote:
On Sat, May 21, 2005 at 02:23:21PM +0800, Ryan Pagquil wrote:
Guys,
Who will be the responsible for the dump when the amanda said that
the host's status is "wait for dumping"?
If I understand correctly, you started a dump and while it was r
Jon LaBadie wrote:
On Sat, May 21, 2005 at 02:23:21PM +0800, Ryan Pagquil wrote:
Guys,
Who will be the responsible for the dump when the amanda said that
the host's status is "wait for dumping"?
If I understand correctly, you started a dump and while it was running
you ran amstat
15 matches
Mail list logo