We also consider
splitting amanda.conf (in the example-subdir) into several single
files to have separate files for dumptypes, tapetypes and such.
That sounds good to me; these are sufficiently distinct concepts so as
to warrant a proper configuration file. I think that would allow
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello, amanda-users,
as some of you may have noticed, no messages posted by me get through
to this list since May, 18th ...
Maybe this one.
Best regards,
Stefan G. Weichinger.
mailto://[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I got all of your mails, most of them in a few identical
Hello, Alex,
on 30.05.2005, 11:45 you wrote to amanda-users@amanda.org:
AJ I got all of your mails, most of them in a few identical copies, as of
AJ this week-end (29 may).
My mails weren't delivered by majordomo, because I simply had
forgotten to subscribe the address [EMAIL PROTECTED] as
Alexander Jolk wrote:
Paul Bijnens wrote:
Making that one configurable at run time would be easy, but it
would also mean that the suid-root program that invokes tar can be
tricked into executing anything you like, giving root privileges to
anyone.
I don't think amrecover calls tar via
On Thursday 19 May 2005 14:47, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
splitting amanda.conf (in the example-subdir) into several single
files to have separate files for dumptypes, tapetypes and such.
Stefan, I can't see this as anything but a big plus myself. Gnubies
seem to have a tendency to get that
On Monday 30 May 2005 00:30, Gentian Hila wrote:
On 5/29/05, Gene Heskett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sunday 29 May 2005 14:50, Gentian Hila wrote:
It it my first time trying to use AMANDA for backup. I went ahead
and read the chapter on amanda from the book Backup and recovery
in Unix, but
On Sat, May 28, 2005 at 08:20:42PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello, amanda-users,
just a short call for opinions:
Who uses gpg-amanda, as described at
http://security.uchicago.edu/tools/gpg-amanda/ ?
I am thinking about including this in the docs and would like to hear
your
