On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 11:27:11PM -0400, Jon LaBadie wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 07:25:44PM -0700, Joe Rhett wrote:
> > Okay, last year I had observed that perfectly valid gnutar exclude lists
> > were being ignored by amanda on Windows machines. The best answer anyone
> > could give me was
On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 07:25:44PM -0700, Joe Rhett wrote:
> Okay, last year I had observed that perfectly valid gnutar exclude lists
> were being ignored by amanda on Windows machines. The best answer anyone
> could give me was to build my own tar program that does the excludes, and
> replace "ru
Okay, last year I had observed that perfectly valid gnutar exclude lists
were being ignored by amanda on Windows machines. The best answer anyone
could give me was to build my own tar program that does the excludes, and
replace "runtar".
Well now I've enabled my first gnutar linux clients, and th
Hello, Dominique,
on 01.06.2005, 19:24 you wrote to amanda-users@amanda.org:
DA> If I understand, only the parameter lenght and filemark is important. So,
DA> my tape drive is compatible with amanda.
Let me repeat this for the records_that_noone_browses:
If your OS supports your tape drive, y
--On Wednesday, June 01, 2005 13:26:22 -0400 Mark Hennessy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> It looks like tar is outputting the offending error notice, and the lines I
> provided in my original e-mail came back in the STRANGE summary for that
> particular mount. I will try 'record no' and see what
Paul Bijnens wrote:
Anthony Valentine wrote:
I am attempting to upgrade from 2.4.2p2 to 2.4.5. The configure and
compile seemed to run fine, with only a warning about missing gnuplot.
However, the selfcheck program doesn't seem to be working. Below is the
output from the 2.4.5 v
It looks like tar is outputting the offending error notice, and the lines
I provided in my original e-mail came back in the STRANGE summary for that
particular mount. I will try 'record no' and see what happens.
Thanks to both of you!
--
Mark P. Hennessy
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--On Wednesday, J
Hi,
If I understand, only the parameter lenght and filemark is important. So,
my tape drive is compatible with amanda.
And I just need to use amtapetype to have the right parameter for the tape
type.
thanks all
> On Wednesday 01 June 2005 09:18, Dominique Arpin wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>> I will
Peter Mueller wrote:
Hi Mark!
I have a read-only NFS share provided by a Windows 2000 server machine
and I want to back it up with my AMANDA cycle. I keep getting these
errors though:
...
? gtar: ./foo/bar: Warning: Cannot stat: Permission denied
? gtar: ./foo/baz: Warning: Cannot stat: Pe
On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 09:55:18AM -0500, Oscar Ricardo Silva wrote:
> I recently replaced my amanda server with a new machine but managed to move
> all indices and databases with it. I did go from FreeBSD to Linux but all
> changer scripts and tape devices are configured properly and working.
--On Wednesday, June 01, 2005 16:49:12 +0200 Peter Mueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hi Mark!
>
>
>> I have a read-only NFS share provided by a Windows 2000 server machine
>> and I want to back it up with my AMANDA cycle. I keep getting these
>> errors though:
>>
>> ...
>> ? gtar: ./foo/
On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 09:56:35AM +0200, Paul Bijnens wrote:
> Jon LaBadie wrote:
> >On Tue, May 31, 2005 at 12:46:32PM -0700, Cameron Matheson wrote:
> >>and also because it seems that dump is not reliable on linux?).
> >
> >
> >Not such a good reason. Will that old saw never die?
>
> Second th
On Wednesday 01 June 2005 09:18, Dominique Arpin wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I will like to know how to find the good parameter for my tape
> backup.
>
>We have a Certance LTO-1 (CL 200).
>
>I found the config for a IBM LTO tape driver:
>
>define tapetype IBM-LTO3580 {
>
>comment "IBM LTO Ultrium 3580 (Hard
I recently replaced my amanda server with a new machine but managed to move
all indices and databases with it. I did go from FreeBSD to Linux but all
changer scripts and tape devices are configured properly and working. The
problem I'm having is that I'm getting
... FAILED [Estimate timeout
Hi Mark!
I have a read-only NFS share provided by a Windows 2000 server machine
and I want to back it up with my AMANDA cycle. I keep getting these
errors though:
...
? gtar: ./foo/bar: Warning: Cannot stat: Permission denied
? gtar: ./foo/baz: Warning: Cannot stat: Permission denied
...
I
I have a read-only NFS share provided by a Windows 2000 server machine and
I want to back it up with my AMANDA cycle. I keep getting these errors
though:
...
? gtar: ./foo/bar: Warning: Cannot stat: Permission denied
? gtar: ./foo/baz: Warning: Cannot stat: Permission denied
...
Is there anyt
Hello, Dominique,
on 01.06.2005, 15:18 you wrote to amanda-users@amanda.org:
DA> I found the config for a IBM LTO tape driver:
DA> define tapetype IBM-LTO3580 {
DA> comment "IBM LTO Ultrium 3580 (Hardware Compression off)"
DA> length 100608 mbytes
DA> filemark 0 kbytes
DA> spee
Hi,
I will like to know how to find the good parameter for my tape backup.
We have a Certance LTO-1 (CL 200).
I found the config for a IBM LTO tape driver:
define tapetype IBM-LTO3580 {
comment "IBM LTO Ultrium 3580 (Hardware Compression off)"
length 100608 mbytes
filemark 0 kbytes
> I am newly configuring amanda2.4.5 with gnutar.
>
Used versions in .configure.
I now find that the log files in /tmp/amanda have version extensions too
(date-stamps). Very handy while constructing the system. How to switch off
in production ???
> OS RedHat7.3 and gcc 3.2 build
>
> Thanks
> Ger
I am newly configuring amanda2.4.5 with gnutar.
First test on a section of the file system of the server leads to STRANGE
errors in logfiles. I've listed the lowest level ones.
What is the cause of these messages. (backup seems to be inorder at a
superficial glance)
How to fix.
OS RedHat7.3 an
Anthony Valentine wrote:
I am attempting to upgrade from 2.4.2p2 to 2.4.5. The configure and
compile seemed to run fine, with only a warning about missing gnuplot.
However, the selfcheck program doesn't seem to be working. Below is the
output from the 2.4.5 version and the 2.4.2p2 version.
Jon LaBadie wrote:
On Tue, May 31, 2005 at 12:46:32PM -0700, Cameron Matheson wrote:
and also because it seems that dump is not reliable on linux?).
Not such a good reason. Will that old saw never die?
Second that. See:
http://dump.sourceforge.net/isdumpdeprecated.html
(that said, I do us
22 matches
Mail list logo
