--On Thursday, June 16, 2005 23:59:28 -0500 Michael D Schleif <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Earlier this year, my HP DAT tape drive had problems, and I replaced it
> with a Compaq/Sony SDT-9000. Mostly, I am still using the same DDS-3
> tapes that I was using, and retired some and added some. My
--On Thursday, June 16, 2005 20:13:41 -0400 Jon LaBadie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> Backup programs like dump, tar, smbclient generate lots of
> messages that are informational fluff. Amanda has hard coded
> lists of things to "not worry about". Others amanda knows
> to print error reports a
Earlier this year, my HP DAT tape drive had problems, and I replaced it
with a Compaq/Sony SDT-9000. Mostly, I am still using the same DDS-3
tapes that I was using, and retired some and added some. My old records
show that I was getting nearly the full 12GB uncompressed tape length.
Since the ta
Chuck Amadi Systems Administrator wrote:
#disklist file
#server.domain.co.uk / comp-root-tar #Thought I was using tar.
and I get the above error.
Whats the best to tackle this still using DSS-4 150mm DAT tapes.
and how to cannot incremental dump new disk as above error.
Thus can I change from
On Thu, Jun 16, 2005 at 11:26:53PM +0200, Nicklas Bondesson wrote:
> I'm using amanda 2.4.5 to backup some Windows shares using amanda and
> smbclient.
>
> Everything went just fine until I upgraded Debian to the lastest stable
> (3.1). This upgrade went from Samba 2.2.3a to 3.0.14a.
>
> I now ge
Hello, Nicklas,
on 16.06.2005, 23:26 you wrote to amanda-users@amanda.org:
> ? Domain=[DOMAIN] OS=[Windows 5.1] Server=[Windows 2000 LAN Manager]
> Any ideas?
Ignore it (it's not a problem) or browse the archives of this list for
a patch that has been recently posted.
Best regards,
Stefan G.
On Thursday 16 June 2005 17:50, Mike Delaney wrote:
>On Thu, Jun 16, 2005 at 02:24:02PM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
>> On Thursday 16 June 2005 10:52, Cody Holland wrote:
>> >I'm a newb to Amanda, and would like to backup everything to a
>> > server running Raid0. I'm sure this is very possible, I
On Thu, Jun 16, 2005 at 02:24:02PM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Thursday 16 June 2005 10:52, Cody Holland wrote:
> >I'm a newb to Amanda, and would like to backup everything to a
> > server running Raid0. I'm sure this is very possible, I just
> > cannot find any docs on it. Any help would be
> Hello, Rebecca,
>
> on 16.06.2005, 19:47 you wrote to amanda-users@amanda.org:
>
> > Here's what I have: A server running amanda-2.4.4p4 running on RHE3
> > intel, and has been for a couple of years. A client running
> > amanda-2.4.4p1 on Sol9, sparc.
>
> > Any suggestions?
>
> Is there any
I'm using amanda 2.4.5 to backup some Windows shares using amanda and
smbclient.
Everything went just fine until I upgraded Debian to the lastest stable
(3.1). This upgrade went from Samba 2.2.3a to 3.0.14a.
I now get this type of message on all of my Windows shares that I back up
from amanda.
F
I'm using amanda 2.4.5 to backup some Windows shares using amanda and
smbclient.
Everything went just fine until I upgraded Debian to the lastest stable
(3.1). This upgrade went from Samba 2.2.3a to 3.0.14a.
I now get this type of message on all of my Windows shares that I back up
from amanda.
F
Hello, Rebecca,
on 16.06.2005, 19:47 you wrote to amanda-users@amanda.org:
> Here's what I have: A server running amanda-2.4.4p4 running on RHE3
> intel, and has been for a couple of years. A client running
> amanda-2.4.4p1 on Sol9, sparc.
> Any suggestions?
Is there any reasonable chance of g
Hello, Rebecca,
on 16.06.2005, 21:22 you wrote to amanda-users@amanda.org:
> Try looking in the amanda FAQ-omatic, here:
> http://amanda.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/fom?_recurse=1&file=25#file_191
> This is the configuration I used and it works like a champ. ;-)
And something more up-to-date:
htt
> On Thursday 16 June 2005 10:52, Cody Holland wrote:
> >I'm a newb to Amanda, and would like to backup everything to
> a server
> >running Raid0. I'm sure this is very possible, I just
> cannot find any
> >docs on it. Any help would be greatly appreciated.
> >
> >Thanks,
> >Cody
Try looki
On Thursday 16 June 2005 10:52, Cody Holland wrote:
>I'm a newb to Amanda, and would like to backup everything to a
> server running Raid0. I'm sure this is very possible, I just
> cannot find any docs on it. Any help would be greatly appreciated.
>
>Thanks,
>Cody
See the FILE: tapetype in the d
Title: dumper5 pid 10813 is messed up, ignoring it
Hi all -
I've searched the archives and did a google search on the above error, and I found an old sourceforge archive from JJ that offered some suggestions, but I still can't get a handle on what's going on.
Here's what I have: A server r
Chuck Amadi Systems Administrator wrote:
I got the culprit
define tapetype HP-DAT {
comment "DAT tape drives"
# data provided by Rob Browning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
length 1930 mbytes
filemark 111 kbytes
speed 468 kbytes
I will edit this bugger.
Actually it is more or less c
Mike Brodbelt wrote:
Peter Mueller wrote:
As I understand it, Amanda interpretes any non-ok result from the tape
device as "out of tape" - as most backup and tape handling software does.
That filesystem has since backed up successfully, so I'm writing it down
to just a glitch in this case. Th
I'm a newb to Amanda, and would like to backup everything to a server
running Raid0. I'm sure this is very possible, I just cannot find any
docs on it. Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
Cody
I just upgraded from 2.4.4p3-2 to 2.5.0 (I need to use calsize to handle
a Network Appliance filer). My short test backup worked fine, but when
I ran my usual backup last night, amanda skipped more than half my DLE's
because it thought it didn't have room on the tape.
It failed for some of the D
Peter Mueller wrote:
>>Does anyone now why Amanda might generate an out of tape error in a
>>situation where it blatantly isn't anywhere even close to the end of the
>>tape?
>>
>
> As I understand it, Amanda interpretes any non-ok result from the tape
> device as "out of tape" - as most back
On Thursday 16 June 2005 08:28, Chuck Amadi Systems Administrator
wrote:
>Hi just posted it
Where? It didn't make it to here so we can verify what you have.
>When I first configured I did rub the command that took for ever and
> a day.
>
>But I did have a 20gb tape in the drive.
Two things Chu
Chuck Amadi Systems Administrator wrote:
DELAYING DUMPS IF NEEDED, total_size 2862734, tape length 1976320 mark
Somewhere in your configuration you have a tape length
of 1976320 KB == 1930 MB instead of 20gb.
Search for 1930 or 1976320 in amanda.conf to see it is defined.
Or post the amanda.co
Hi just posted it
When I first configured I did rub the command that took for ever and a
day.
But I did have a 20gb tape in the drive.
Cheers
Is there a way to reset it as I have edited the
On Thu, 2005-06-16 at 14:20 +0200, Montagni, Giovanni wrote:
> Have you ever run amtapetype command? it
Chuck Amadi Systems Administrator schrieb:
Hi I have tried backing up "/" using the disklist
with a 20GB DDS-4 150MM DAT tape and I get this error below.
The size is only 3GB
Is there a level I need to adjust in the amanda.conf file.
Um,
perhaps the tapesize parameter?
Christoph
sever.do
AILED server.smtl.co.uk / 20050616 0 [dump larger than tape,
2862305 KB, but cannot incremental dump new disk] delay: Total size now
286.
Any Ideas as I am using a 20GB dat tape.
--
Unix/ Linux Systems Administrator
Chuck Amadi
The Surgical Material Testing Laboratory (SMTL),
Princess of Wales Hos
Hi I have tried backing up "/" using the disklist
with a 20GB DDS-4 150MM DAT tape and I get this error below.
The size is only 3GB
Is there a level I need to adjust in the amanda.conf file.
sever.domain.co.uk:/ 0 planner: [dump larger than tape, 2867765 KB, but
cannot incremental dump new disk]
On Thu, 16 Jun 2005, Erik P. Olsen wrote:
Below the statistics from my last backup. I assume the times are all
elapsed times, but why is amanda so wrong in estimating the times? Or is
it a bug?
STATISTICS:
Total Full Daily
-
Erik P. Olsen schrieb:
Hi,
Below the statistics from my last backup. I assume the times are all
elapsed times, but why is amanda so wrong in estimating the times? Or is
it a bug?
STATISTICS:
Total Full Daily
Hi,
Below the statistics from my last backup. I assume the times are all
elapsed times, but why is amanda so wrong in estimating the times? Or is
it a bug?
STATISTICS:
Total Full Daily
Estimate Time (hrs:m
Vects wrote:
Hello there,
I mentioned amanda runs only one dump of computer/partition the same
time. Is there any way configure amanda to run many dumps at once for
different computers? I have 6 computers to backup in disklist, it's
about 4 partitions per computer, backup takes long time to finis
31 matches
Mail list logo