Artur F. Pimentel wrote:
AMANDA-tape-device-rule: If your OS supports it, AMANDA supports
it.
I quite sure the VXA-2 will work, but I'm very afraid about the
autoloader (By the way, autoloader and tape changer is the same
thing? I have already read something about it in Amanda
Ryan Pagquil wrote:
Hi guys,
I have a question about amanda logs. What's the meaning of
promoted from no days ahead?
this is the log:
planner: Incremental of ns2:/data/back-up/rad-db/ bumped to level 2.
planner: Incremental of radius:/var/back-up/rad-db/ bumped to level 3.
planner:
Hello again,
I start a new thread on the hackers-list to reflect the existence of a
new document and its beta-status:
http://www.amanda.org/docs/howto-gpg.html
This describes what I have set up and tested successfully yesterday.
Comments welcome, as always.
NOTE THAT THIS IS STILL JUST A
Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
Derek Price wrote:
I
have a vtape setup here but when I try to recover I get the following
message from amrecover:
Extracting files using tape drive file:/l/slots/ on host localhost.
Really?
Yes, really. I've corrected the FQDN issue, but I don't think the
Derek Price wrote:
Yes, really. I've corrected the FQDN issue, but I don't think the
recover problem had anything to do with that since when recovering from
tape with almost exactly the same setup things worked? Any ideas why
this might happen?
You wrote almost exactly the same setup.
Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
Update:
amrecover works now as well, indexes are generated and read properly.
The vtapes are encrypted AND (more important) decrypted now, works fine
so far.
I start a new thread on the hackers-list to reflect the existence of a
new document and its
Is this entry in the FAQ a complete description of the network
interactions between amanda client and amanda server?
http://amanda.sourceforge.net/fom-serve/cache/139.html
I'm not relishing the thought of working this out in ipchains ...
I'm pushing to (finally) move to iptables. But, I may have
Eric Dantan Rzewnicki wrote:
Is this entry in the FAQ a complete description of the network
interactions between amanda client and amanda server?
http://amanda.sourceforge.net/fom-serve/cache/139.html
I'm not relishing the thought of working this out in ipchains ...
I'm pushing to (finally)
Is there a way of having AMANDA pass dump command line options? I've got
a few FreeBSD 5 boxes, and I'd like to be able to activate the
filesystem snapshot feature of dump.
--
-- Skylar Thompson ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
-- http://www.cs.earlham.edu/~skylar/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP
On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 11:48:14AM -0500, Skylar Thompson wrote:
Is there a way of having AMANDA pass dump command line options? I've got
a few FreeBSD 5 boxes, and I'd like to be able to activate the
filesystem snapshot feature of dump.
Not built in to the system.
Generally the way this is
On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 04:30:17PM +0200, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
Eric Dantan Rzewnicki wrote:
Is this entry in the FAQ a complete description of the network
interactions between amanda client and amanda server?
http://amanda.sourceforge.net/fom-serve/cache/139.html
I'm not relishing the
--On Tuesday, June 28, 2005 15:09:42 -0400 Eric Dantan Rzewnicki [EMAIL
PROTECTED] wrote:
As far as I can figure out there isn't a way for me to prevent the
source port from being masqueraded using ipchains. Please correct me if
I am wrong.
It's been so long since I used ipchains I couldn't
On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 02:46:12PM -0500, Frank Smith wrote:
--On Tuesday, June 28, 2005 15:09:42 -0400 Eric Dantan Rzewnicki [EMAIL
PROTECTED] wrote:
As far as I can figure out there isn't a way for me to prevent the
source port from being masqueraded using ipchains. Please correct me if
Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
Derek Price wrote:
Yes, really. I've corrected the FQDN issue, but I don't think the
recover problem had anything to do with that since when recovering from
tape with almost exactly the same setup things worked? Any ideas why
this might happen?
You wrote
I've had no time to work on this lately. I will get back to it soon.
On Wed, Jun 15, 2005 at 05:39:54PM +0200, Paul Bijnens wrote:
Paul Bijnens wrote on 2 June 2005:
OK, I'll jump on this.
Any progress on this problem?
Can you reproduce the problem with a small setup, that I could
15 matches
Mail list logo
