Jon LaBadie wrote:
On Tue, Jul 05, 2005 at 11:14:19PM +0200, Paul Bijnens wrote:
Amanda will not complain
- if the exclude file on the client is not there at all
In this case amanda can construct a gtar argument list that does
not contain the exclude list of a non-existing file.
- or if the
On Wed, Jul 06, 2005 at 10:06:07AM +0200, Paul Bijnens wrote:
Jon LaBadie wrote:
Paul,
I probably should look it up myself, but I'm feeling lazy.
Lazy, but you're correct!
I thought that the various exclude features were generalized so that
amanda would make up its own exclude file
khalid maqsudi wrote:
below is the error message from the amdump.X. My OS is solaris 8. thanks
for your help.
m5413.drsite.univision.com $ cat amdump.1
amdump: start at Tue Jul 5 13:21:10 EDT 2005
...
changer: opening pipe to: /usr/local/libexec/chg-zd-mtx -info
changer: got exit: 2 str:
Hi below is an output of the three log files. amandad.DATETIME.debug,
sendsize.*.debug, runtar.*.debug
#
sendsize: debug 1 pid 6380 ruid 10035 euid 10035: start at Tue Jul 5
14:39:51 2005
sendsize: version
On Tue, 2005-07-05 at 22:02 -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
amanda cannot do an suid root if it was built as root, no way around
it due to the failure of the suid command if its already owned by
root.
Certainly, but I don't think the Debian packages were built as root. I
just choose to run amdump
On Wed, 2005-07-06 at 11:01 -0400, Jon LaBadie wrote:
BTW, is it just amcheck, or amdump as well,
that does or does not complain?
In my experience it's only been amcheck that complains, amdump is still
happy to do the backups, so this confusion hasn't been critical. ;)
--
Graeme Humphries
khalid maqsudi wrote:
Hi below is an output of the three log files. amandad.DATETIME.debug,
sendsize.*.debug, runtar.*.debug
sendsize[6382]: time 0.032: DUMP: Cannot open dump device
`/dev/md/rdsk/d10': Permission
On Wed, Jul 06, 2005 at 09:32:13AM -0600, Graeme Humphries wrote:
On Wed, 2005-07-06 at 11:01 -0400, Jon LaBadie wrote:
BTW, is it just amcheck, or amdump as well,
that does or does not complain?
In my experience it's only been amcheck that complains, amdump is still
happy to do the
Jon LaBadie wrote:
Seems to me the only thing that needs changing is the
amanda.conf man page. Currently it says:
... With exclude list, the string is a file name on the
client containing GNU-tar exclude expressions.
...
If optional is specified for exclude list, then amcheck
On Wed, 2005-07-06 at 18:34 +0200, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
After reading all that thread I have to ask:
Do you all agree with me editing the man-page as Jon suggested?
It seems reasonable to me.
On Wednesday 06 July 2005 11:31, Graeme Humphries wrote:
On Tue, 2005-07-05 at 22:02 -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
amanda cannot do an suid root if it was built as root, no way
around it due to the failure of the suid command if its already
owned by root.
Certainly, but I don't think the Debian
On Wed, 2005-07-06 at 13:59 -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
I think this is going to be problematic, Graeme. But I'll defer to
someone who is a bit more cognizant of the actual code. I do know
that I cannot run either amcheck or amdump here as root, the exit,
complaining about it, is instant
I have a few hosts where some filesystems fail to be backed up. I thought
it might be firewall/iptables issues but the fact that at least one
filesystem on the host is successful seems to ruin that idea. Also, on the
amanda server one of the hosts having problems is completely trusted on all
Greetings. We've had some problems with the amanda backups on our one
Solaris system. We're still tweaking, so I won't yet go into details,
but I did want to ask a question.
We're trying to backup some relatively large file systems to an SDLT 320
tape drive. Currently the largest file
--On Wednesday, July 06, 2005 15:44:59 -0700 Michael Hannon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Greetings. We've had some problems with the amanda backups on our one
Solaris system. We're still tweaking, so I won't yet go into details, but I
did want to ask a question.
We're trying to backup some
On Wed, Jul 06, 2005 at 03:44:59PM -0700, Michael Hannon wrote:
Greetings. We've had some problems with the amanda backups on our one
Solaris system. We're still tweaking, so I won't yet go into details,
but I did want to ask a question.
We're trying to backup some relatively large file
Oscar Ricardo Silva wrote:
I have a few hosts where some filesystems fail to be backed up. I
thought it might be firewall/iptables issues but the fact that at least
one filesystem on the host is successful seems to ruin that idea. Also,
...
scuff.cc.utexas.edu /1
17 matches
Mail list logo
