Re: Running Amanda exclusively with TCP

2005-07-22 Thread Tanniel Simonian
Jon LaBadie said: > On Fri, Jul 22, 2005 at 06:34:13PM -0700, Tanniel Simonian wrote: >> Fellow amanda group, >> >> I am in a bit of a bind where I am trying to backup servers across >> different routed networks. >> >> I am on a debian system using the amanda-client and amanda-common >> packages >>

Re: Running Amanda exclusively with TCP

2005-07-22 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Fri, Jul 22, 2005 at 06:34:13PM -0700, Tanniel Simonian wrote: > Fellow amanda group, > > I am in a bit of a bind where I am trying to backup servers across > different routed networks. > > I am on a debian system using the amanda-client and amanda-common packages > on the client servers and a

Running Amanda exclusively with TCP

2005-07-22 Thread Tanniel Simonian
Fellow amanda group, I am in a bit of a bind where I am trying to backup servers across different routed networks. I am on a debian system using the amanda-client and amanda-common packages on the client servers and amanda-server (amanda-client and amanda-common) on the backup-server. Amanda has

Re: Amanda from RPMs

2005-07-22 Thread Matt Hyclak
On Fri, Jul 22, 2005 at 03:30:57PM -0400, FM enlightened us: > thanks again, > Last question : > Because it is a BuildRequires, I suppose that I do not have to update > libtool on all server, only on my RPM builder server > Yes, I believe that is the case. Perhaps Jean-Louis or one of the other d

Re: Amanda from RPMs

2005-07-22 Thread Matt Hyclak
On Fri, Jul 22, 2005 at 01:30:30PM -0500, Vicki Stanfield enlightened us: > Matt Hyclak wrote: > > >On Fri, Jul 22, 2005 at 01:05:28PM -0500, Vicki Stanfield enlightened us: > >>Looks good, Matt, but how about adding a specific example of changing > >>the --with-user config option since that is c

Re: Amanda from RPMs

2005-07-22 Thread Vicki Stanfield
Matt Hyclak wrote: On Fri, Jul 22, 2005 at 01:05:28PM -0500, Vicki Stanfield enlightened us: Matt Hyclak wrote: It's a little later than I promised, however I've pulled together a page covering some of the RPM changes I've proposed for amanda, along with some instructions for those un

Re: Amanda from RPMs

2005-07-22 Thread Matt Hyclak
On Fri, Jul 22, 2005 at 01:05:28PM -0500, Vicki Stanfield enlightened us: > Matt Hyclak wrote: > > >It's a little later than I promised, however I've pulled together a page > >covering some of the RPM changes I've proposed for amanda, along with some > >instructions for those unfamiliar with rebui

Re: Amanda from RPMs

2005-07-22 Thread Vicki Stanfield
Matt Hyclak wrote: It's a little later than I promised, however I've pulled together a page covering some of the RPM changes I've proposed for amanda, along with some instructions for those unfamiliar with rebuilding RPMs. http://www.math.ohiou.edu/~hyclak/casit/amanda/ Feel free to link to th

amverifyrun problems with tape in drive, not slot

2005-07-22 Thread Graeme Humphries
I'm having some problems with amverifyrun. If I do something like "amverifyrun daily", I get the following: Tape changer is chg-zd-mtx... 1 slot... Verify summary to root Defects file is /tmp/amanda/amverify.6011/defects amverify daily Fri Jul 22 10:08:26 CST 2005 Loading -1 slot... ** Error load

Re: Amanda from RPMs

2005-07-22 Thread Matt Hyclak
On Fri, Jul 22, 2005 at 12:07:12PM -0400, Frederic Medery enlightened us: > I tryed to build for rhel3 but : > error: Failed build dependencies: > libtool >= 1.5.6 is needed by amanda-2.4.5-2.lex_rhel3 > > rhel version is libtool-1.4.3-6. > > is it just of copy/paste proble between rehl3

Re: Amanda from RPMs

2005-07-22 Thread Frederic Medery
I tryed to build for rhel3 but : error: Failed build dependencies: libtool >= 1.5.6 is needed by amanda-2.4.5-2.lex_rhel3 rhel version is libtool-1.4.3-6. is it just of copy/paste proble between rehl3 and rhel4 spec file or do I need a new version ? Thanks again for your work !! > I've

Re: AMRECOVER testing

2005-07-22 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Fri, Jul 22, 2005 at 09:53:46AM +0200, Paul Bijnens wrote: > Jon LaBadie wrote: > >On Thu, Jul 21, 2005 at 10:57:35AM -0400, Joshua Baker-LePain wrote: > >>On Thu, 21 Jul 2005 at 10:52am, LaValley, Brian E wrote > >>>New question: There are many debug files here. When things are > >>>all working

Re:

2005-07-22 Thread Paul Bijnens
Graeme Humphries wrote: On Tue, 2005-07-19 at 19:07 -0600, Glenn English wrote: On Tue, 2005-07-19 at 21:01 +0200, Paul Bijnens wrote: Yes, correct, but you still need ~amanda/.amandahosts instead of /root/.amandahosts . Or ~backup/.amandahosts on Debian. I'm sure there's a good reason for

Re: AMRECOVER testing

2005-07-22 Thread Paul Bijnens
Jon LaBadie wrote: On Thu, Jul 21, 2005 at 10:57:35AM -0400, Joshua Baker-LePain wrote: On Thu, 21 Jul 2005 at 10:52am, LaValley, Brian E wrote New question: There are many debug files here. When things are all working fine, do people usually turn off debugging so this enormous number of file

Re: Amanda from RPMs

2005-07-22 Thread Paul Bijnens
FM wrote: Great !!! Can I use 2.4.5 server with 2.4.4 clients ? I used rpm from RH (amanda 2.4.4p1) Yes. The client-server protocol used in 2.4.0 and later can interoperate with different versions, even 2.5 experimental installations. Of course that means that you only use the common features o