> On 2006-03-09 18:14, Iulian Topliceanu wrote:
Paul Bijnens wrote:
>>> Do you have runtapes > 1 ?
>>> Or do you run amdump multiple times a day?
>>
>> Amanda uses sometime more than 1 tape per run. That's why vtape-7 was
>> again next. So even if I would have defined runtapes 1, Amanda would
Ian Turner wrote:
That is very fascinating. I don't think it is a tar problem, but the nature of
the problem is not immediately obvious to me. Perhaps you can do the
following:
1) Remove /tmp/amanda
2) Run amrecover (on the server)
3) Attach all the files in /tmp/amanda. It shouldn't be big, b
On Thursday 09 March 2006 12:14, Iulian Topliceanu wrote:
>> On 2006-03-09 17:19, Iulian Topliceanu wrote:
>>> Paul Bijnens wrote:
On 2006-03-09 13:25, Iulian Topliceanu wrote:
> The dump definition looks like this:
>
> dumpcycle 10 day# the number of days in the normal dum
On 2006-03-09 18:14, Iulian Topliceanu wrote:
Paul Bijnens wrote:
Do you have runtapes > 1 ?
Or do you run amdump multiple times a day?
Amanda uses sometime more than 1 tape per run. That's why vtape-7 was
again next. So even if I would have defined runtapes 1, Amanda would have
used more.
A
> On 2006-03-09 17:19, Iulian Topliceanu wrote:
>> Paul Bijnens wrote:
>>> On 2006-03-09 13:25, Iulian Topliceanu wrote:
The dump definition looks like this:
dumpcycle 10 day# the number of days in the normal dump cycle
runspercycle 8 day# the number of amdump runs
On 2006-03-09 17:19, Iulian Topliceanu wrote:
Paul Bijnens wrote:
On 2006-03-09 13:25, Iulian Topliceanu wrote:
The dump definition looks like this:
dumpcycle 10 day# the number of days in the normal dump cycle
runspercycle 8 day# the number of amdump runs in dumpcycle days
tapecy
The mail very well formated, so I'm sending it again. Sorry for the
duplicate.
Paul Bijnens wrote:
> On 2006-03-09 13:25, Iulian Topliceanu wrote:
>>
>> I'm using AMANDA server 2.4.5p1 on a RH 9 having DLT tapes and vtapes as
>> well.
>>
>> All the backup clients are Linux machines using ext3 fs.
Paul Bijnens wrote:
> On 2006-03-09 13:25, Iulian Topliceanu wrote:
>>
>> I'm using AMANDA server 2.4.5p1 on a RH 9 having DLT tapes and vtapes as
>> well.
>>
>> All the backup clients are Linux machines using ext3 fs.
>>
>> I had two particular problem with a client running CentOS and using
>> tar
On Thu, Mar 09, 2006 at 02:43:19PM +0100, Moritz Both wrote:
>
> Which is the correct way to backup windows servers using amanda? Is
> there one?
>
> First of all, I think this must have been discussed a lot of times on
> the list - probably. Unfortunately, I did not have much luck searching
>
On 2006-03-09 14:43, Moritz Both wrote:
Which is the correct way to backup windows servers using amanda? Is
there one?
Windows backup is indeed not handled first class, as you noted.
Nor it is tested/used extensively either.
I did use the smbclient way with Amanda for some time on some
serve
Which is the correct way to backup windows servers using amanda? Is
there one?
First of all, I think this must have been discussed a lot of times on
the list - probably. Unfortunately, I did not have much luck searching
the archives, only random single statements -
We are running amanda fo
On 2006-03-09 13:25, Iulian Topliceanu wrote:
I'm using AMANDA server 2.4.5p1 on a RH 9 having DLT tapes and vtapes as
well.
All the backup clients are Linux machines using ext3 fs.
I had two particular problem with a client running CentOS and using
tar-1.14 and amanda-client 2.4.5p1.
The Ce
Hi,
I'm using AMANDA server 2.4.5p1 on a RH 9 having DLT tapes and vtapes as
well.
All the backup clients are Linux machines using ext3 fs.
I had two particular problem with a client running CentOS and using
tar-1.14 and amanda-client 2.4.5p1.
1: amadmin (and the mail reports as well) reported
On Wednesday, 08.03.2006 at 12:05 -0500, Jon LaBadie wrote:
> So, rather than use "listed-incremental" to recognize
> it is a renamed directory, gnutar's behavior is to
> consider then entire directory tree "changed" and
> back up the entire tree.
>
> Reading this thread reminded me of another on
14 matches
Mail list logo