On Mon, Apr 03, 2006 at 08:34:37PM -0400, Guy Dallaire wrote:
> 2006/4/3, Jon LaBadie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> > FMI:
> > did you attempt to recover specific files, specific directories,
> > or the entire DLE root?
> >
>
> That was a subdir of the DLE, I decided to restore the whole
> subdirecto
On Monday 03 April 2006 19:21, stan wrote:
>On Mon, Apr 03, 2006 at 05:15:47PM +0200, Paul Bijnens wrote:
>> On 2006-04-03 16:51, stan wrote:
>> >If I'm using chg-multi, the tape device(s) are defiend in it's
>> > config file. Given that do I even need to set tapdev in
>> > amanda.conf?
>>
>> Form
2006/4/3, Jon LaBadie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> FMI:
> did you attempt to recover specific files, specific directories,
> or the entire DLE root?
>
That was a subdir of the DLE, I decided to restore the whole
subdirectory and all the files and dir beneath it, as it was almost
completely destroyed.
On Mon, Apr 03, 2006 at 05:15:47PM +0200, Paul Bijnens wrote:
> On 2006-04-03 16:51, stan wrote:
> >If I'm using chg-multi, the tape device(s) are defiend in it's config file.
> >Given that do I even need to set tapdev in amanda.conf?
> >
>
> Form the Example found in the wiki:
>
> http://wiki.zm
On Mon, Apr 03, 2006 at 03:52:30PM -0400, Guy Dallaire wrote:
> This morning, someone goofed and destroyed important files in a
> directory. My last level 1 backup was from last friday, and another
> full dump from last tuesday.
>
> I then proceeded to run amrecover and recover the files "in place
Jean-Louis Martineau wrote:
Jon LaBadie wrote:
On Mon, Apr 03, 2006 at 08:46:05AM -0500, Jim Summers wrote:
Hello List,
I am experiencing an odd behavior from amanda. I have a client that
I have been backing up for a couple of years now. A while back, I
noticed that it was doing multiple
>
>
> http://wiki.zmanda.com/index.php/Why_does_amrecover_erase_files%3F
>
Thanks for the tip. Would be interesting to have an option to "always
restore and never delete" on the commanbd line though
Guy Dallaire schreef:
This morning, someone goofed and destroyed important files in a
directory. My last level 1 backup was from last friday, and another
full dump from last tuesday.
I then proceeded to run amrecover and recover the files "in place",
that is, I changed to the DLE's root director
On Monday 03 April 2006 20:25, Kevin Till wrote:
> Anne Wilson wrote:
> > On Monday 03 April 2006 19:50, Anne Wilson wrote:
> >>Kevin said:
> >>amcheck is not setuid root on the source tree so it fails to bind a
> >>privileged port while perform host check.
> >>
> >>I've made sure now that all the
This morning, someone goofed and destroyed important files in a
directory. My last level 1 backup was from last friday, and another
full dump from last tuesday.
I then proceeded to run amrecover and recover the files "in place",
that is, I changed to the DLE's root directory before restoring
Whil
Anne Wilson wrote:
On Monday 03 April 2006 19:50, Anne Wilson wrote:
Kevin said:
amcheck is not setuid root on the source tree so it fails to bind a
privileged port while perform host check.
I've made sure now that all the /usr/local/sbin/ executables are owned
root:disk, and amcheck is setuid
On Monday 03 April 2006 19:50, Anne Wilson wrote:
>
> Kevin said:
> amcheck is not setuid root on the source tree so it fails to bind a
> privileged port while perform host check.
>
> I've made sure now that all the /usr/local/sbin/ executables are owned
> root:disk, and amcheck is setuid. What el
On Monday 03 April 2006 19:01, Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Monday 03 April 2006 13:39, Anne Wilson wrote:
>
> And I've been helping her offlist. This error is what you get when you
> run the amcheck built in the /home/amanda/amanda-version/server-src
> tree, I just tried it and got similar squawks.
Gene Heskett wrote:
On Monday 03 April 2006 13:39, Anne Wilson wrote:
And I've been helping her offlist. This error is what you get when you
run the amcheck built in the /home/amanda/amanda-version/server-src
tree, I just tried it and got similar squawks. Running it normally, no
squawks.
On Monday 03 April 2006 13:39, Anne Wilson wrote:
And I've been helping her offlist. This error is what you get when you
run the amcheck built in the /home/amanda/amanda-version/server-src
tree, I just tried it and got similar squawks. Running it normally, no
squawks.
>I have been helped, of
On Monday 03 April 2006 18:47, you wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 03, 2006 at 06:39:44PM +0100, Anne Wilson wrote:
> > I have been helped, off-list, to configure amanda, and it looks as though
> > I am at last ready to run, except that I am seeing the following:
> >
> > Amanda Backup Client Hosts Check
> > -
I have been helped, off-list, to configure amanda, and it looks as though I am
at last ready to run, except that I am seeing the following:
Amanda Backup Client Hosts Check
ERROR: NAK borg: host borg: port 35280 not secure
borg is the host on which amanda will be
Jon LaBadie wrote:
On Mon, Apr 03, 2006 at 08:46:05AM -0500, Jim Summers wrote:
Hello List,
I am experiencing an odd behavior from amanda. I have a client that I have
been backing up for a couple of years now. A while back, I noticed that it
was doing multiple level 0's on one DLE within
Paul Bijnens wrote:
On 2006-04-03 07:38, Josef Wolf wrote:
On Sun, Apr 02, 2006 at 09:34:59PM +0200, Paul Bijnens wrote:
That would mean that the estimate phase should be smart enough (may
be add an option "autosplit" for those DLE's where you want that) to
pick a few large subdirectories ou
Paul Bijnens wrote:
To be exact, the last pair of "include" stmts would be equivalent to:
include "./foo" "./bar"
Note the quotes around EACH argument.
But there is currently a bug that a space inside an exclude or include
argument is not escaped when passing those strings to the client.
On 2006-04-03 16:51, stan wrote:
If I'm using chg-multi, the tape device(s) are defiend in it's config file.
Given that do I even need to set tapdev in amanda.conf?
Form the Example found in the wiki:
http://wiki.zmanda.com/index.php/File_driver#Virtual_tapes_with_chg-multi
tpchanger "chg-mu
Jean-Louis Martineau said:
> Are you on a machine where a LONG is 4 bytes in size?
Yup
> Then it's an overflow, could you try the attached patch.
Thanks - patch applied, backup running, I'll let you know how it went tomorrow.
Paul
> Paul Haldane wrote:
> > I've just installed 2.5.0 on one of
If I'm using chg-multi, the tape device(s) are defiend in it's config file.
Given that do I even need to set tapdev in amanda.conf?
--
U.S. Encouraged by Vietnam Vote - Officials Cite 83% Turnout Despite Vietcong
Terror
- New York Times 9/3/1967
Paul,
Are you on a machine where a LONG is 4 bytes in size?
Then it's an overflow, could you try the attached patch.
Jean-Louis
Paul Haldane wrote:
I've just installed 2.5.0 on one of our backup servers (output from amadmin
version at end) and have some odd behaviour to do with holding dis
> From: Jim Summers
> Sent: 03 April 2006 14:46
>
...
> I checked it a little bit ago with amstatus and here is what
> it is saying for that host/dle:
>
> 192095k dumping 108864k ( 56.67%) (0:21:55)
>
> Is the 21:55 21hours and 55minutes?
Nope - that's the clock time that Amanda started doi
On Mon, Apr 03, 2006 at 08:46:05AM -0500, Jim Summers wrote:
> Hello List,
>
> I am experiencing an odd behavior from amanda. I have a client that I have
> been backing up for a couple of years now. A while back, I noticed that it
> was doing multiple level 0's on one DLE within one backup cyc
On Mon, Apr 03, 2006 at 07:38:57AM +0200, Josef Wolf wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 02, 2006 at 09:34:59PM +0200, Paul Bijnens wrote:
>
> > That would mean that the estimate phase should be smart enough (may
> > be add an option "autosplit" for those DLE's where you want that) to
> > pick a few large subdir
Hello List,
I am experiencing an odd behavior from amanda. I have a client that I have
been backing up for a couple of years now. A while back, I noticed that it
was doing multiple level 0's on one DLE within one backup cycle. It stopped
for a while but then began doing it again a couple of
I've just installed 2.5.0 on one of our backup servers (output from amadmin
version at end) and have some odd behaviour to do with holding disks
(at least I think that's the problem).
We've been running Amanda (using the standard Fedora Core 2 rpms
-amanda-2.4.4p2-3) for ages - no problems.
On 2006-04-03 07:38, Josef Wolf wrote:
On Sun, Apr 02, 2006 at 09:34:59PM +0200, Paul Bijnens wrote:
That would mean that the estimate phase should be smart enough (may
be add an option "autosplit" for those DLE's where you want that) to
pick a few large subdirectories out and then split the DL
30 matches
Mail list logo
