Jon LaBadie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit sur 30/06/2006
15:47:24 :
> > Sorry for asking but, why do you say backuping directly to tape
is slow?
> >
> > I guess he's doing local backups (ie: The 700GB are not sent
over the
> > network every full backups).
> >
> > In this configuration what would
On 2006-06-30 12:46, Stefan Eissing wrote:
Hi,
i was unsuccessful finding an answer, so I turned here. Apologies if
this has been asked for a zillion times already:
In amanda 2.4.5 amcheck returned an error and sent a mail when the tape
did have a wrong labvel. Under 2.4.5 it still detects t
On 2006-06-30 12:40, Joe Donner (sent by Nabble.com) wrote:
Dear all,
I think I may finally have cracked Amanda, but there are two things not
quite clear to me:
1. When you do an amrecover, do you HAVE to rewind the tape first? This
isn't a problem as such, I'm just wondering whether or not i
Paul Bijnens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a
écrit sur 03/07/2006 10:11:48 :
> On 2006-07-03 09:34, Cyrille Bollu wrote:
> >
> > Jon LaBadie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit sur 30/06/2006 15:47:24
:
> >
> > > > Sorry for asking but, why do you say backuping
directly to tape is
> > slow?
> > > >
> > > > I
On 2006-07-03 09:34, Cyrille Bollu wrote:
Jon LaBadie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit sur 30/06/2006 15:47:24 :
> > Sorry for asking but, why do you say backuping directly to tape is
slow?
> >
> > I guess he's doing local backups (ie: The 700GB are not sent over the
> > network every full bac
Hello,
I'm getting this on my backup report.
DUMP SUMMARY:
DUMPER STATS TAPER STATS
HOSTNAME DISKL ORIG-MB OUT-MB COMP% MMM:SS KB/s MMM:SS KB/s
-- - -
a
On 2006-07-03 09:55, Luis Rodrigues wrote:
Hello,
I'm getting this on my backup report.
DUMP SUMMARY:
DUMPER STATS TAPER STATS
HOSTNAME DISKL ORIG-MB OUT-MB COMP% MMM:SS KB/s MMM:SS KB/s
-- ---
On 2006-07-03 09:55, Luis Rodrigues wrote:
Hello,
I'm getting this on my backup report.
DUMP SUMMARY:
DUMPER STATS TAPER STATS
HOSTNAME DISKL ORIG-MB OUT-MB COMP% MMM:SS KB/s MMM:SS KB/s
-- ---
> >
> > As you can see just some are missing, and it varies depending on the days.
> > What is this?
>
> One something more weird:
> You seem to have 2 entries for those DLE's: one succeeded, one missing.
> How did you get 2 lines for one DLE???
Thats what I would like to know.
I have no other
Luis Rodrigues wrote:
One something more weird:
You seem to have 2 entries for those DLE's: one succeeded, one missing.
How did you get 2 lines for one DLE???
Thats what I would like to know.
autoflush, by any chance?
Alex
--
Alexander Jolk / BUF Compagnie
tel +33-1 42 68
On Mon, 03 Jul 2006 12:40:24 +0200
Alexander Jolk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Luis Rodrigues wrote:
> >>One something more weird:
> >>You seem to have 2 entries for those DLE's: one succeeded, one missing.
> >>How did you get 2 lines for one DLE???
> >
> >
> > Thats what I would like to know.
>
Hello,
I have a simple question: does amanda support dumping/restoring over IPv6?
I have a server behind a NATbox that I need to backup periodically. IPv6 would
be the neat solution. Otherwise, are there IPv4 solutions?
I read somewhere about iptables having a module for amanda. How does it w
On 2006-07-03 13:11, Luis Rodrigues wrote:
On Mon, 03 Jul 2006 12:40:24 +0200
Alexander Jolk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Luis Rodrigues wrote:
One something more weird:
You seem to have 2 entries for those DLE's: one succeeded, one missing.
How did you get 2 lines for one DLE???
Thats what I
>
> This seems to be a veeery old config.
> It still uses parameter "diskdir" which is deprecated for
> over 8 years now. Moreover in 2.5.0 is does't exist anymore.
> Also the comments about infofile being a database filename (which
> is was in Amanda 2.3 or so -- it is a directory now),
On Mon, Jul 03, 2006 at 09:34:24AM +0200, Cyrille Bollu wrote:
> Jon LaBadie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit sur 30/06/2006 15:47:24 :
>
> > > Sorry for asking but, why do you say backuping directly to tape is
> slow?
> > >
> > > I guess he's doing local backups (ie: The 700GB are not sent over the
On Mon, Jul 03, 2006 at 03:30:45PM +0200, Luis Rodrigues wrote:
> >
> > This seems to be a veeery old config.
> > It still uses parameter "diskdir" which is deprecated for
> > over 8 years now. Moreover in 2.5.0 is does't exist anymore.
> > Also the comments about infofile being a databas
>
> In the deep recesses of my dusty memory I recall getting duplicate
> entries with one "MISSING" when I was testing the new server I was
> using. I no longer have those results so I can't confirm it and
> at the time I may have ignored it thinking it was an artifact of
> running multiple dumps
On Monday 03 July 2006 00:55, Luis Rodrigues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm getting this on my backup report.
>
> DUMP SUMMARY:
>DUMPER STATS TAPER
> STATS HOSTNAME DISKL ORIG-MB OUT-MB COMP% MMM:SS KB/s
> MMM:SS
On Mon, Jul 03, 2006 at 08:36:17AM -0700, Jeffrey Anderson wrote:
> On Monday 03 July 2006 00:55, Luis Rodrigues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I'm getting this on my backup report.
> >
> > DUMP SUMMARY:
> >DUMPER STATS TAPER
> >
Does anyone have an amanda rpm for RHEL3? I have a client with this server
and I would like to put amanda on it to do the backups. Will one of the
rpm's for rhe[ls]4 work?
I would prefer to use a package instead of compiling. I tried to compile and
apparently the server doesn't have all the necess
Rodrigo Ventura wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have a simple question: does amanda support dumping/restoring over IPv6?
>
> I have a server behind a NATbox that I need to backup periodically. IPv6
> would
> be the neat solution. Otherwise, are there IPv4 solutions?
I don't know about the IPv6 question
On Mon, Jul 03, 2006 at 11:56:23AM -0500, Gordon J. Mills III enlightened us:
> Does anyone have an amanda rpm for RHEL3? I have a client with this server
> and I would like to put amanda on it to do the backups. Will one of the
> rpm's for rhe[ls]4 work?
>
> I would prefer to use a package instea
Hi all, I want to specify "estimate server" in my dumptype definition in
my amanda.conf file; however, amanda doesn't seem to like it:
"/etc/amanda/DailySet1/amanda.conf", line 68: dump type parameter
expected
"/etc/amanda/DailySet1/amanda.conf", line 68: end of line expected
Here's the section o
On Mon, Jul 03, 2006 at 02:30:57PM -0400, Byarlay, Wayne A. wrote:
> Hi all, I want to specify "estimate server" in my dumptype definition in
> my amanda.conf file; however, amanda doesn't seem to like it:
>
> "/etc/amanda/DailySet1/amanda.conf", line 68: dump type parameter
> expected
> "/etc/ama
Hi,
* Sung, Raymond CW <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20060627 10:40]:
> Dear Amanda Users,
>
> I'm new to using makefiles and I need to install the client part of Amanda on
> an IRIX 6.5 machine.
I was away all week last week so I'll jump in even though
this thread seems to be dead.
I have an irix box
Hello,
I've recently tried to set up my OS X (10.4.7) laptop to backup to my
Amanda server running Gentoo. My Amanda server has been backing itself
up without any problems for a while now. However, when I run amcheck,
it times out trying to contact my laptop:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~> amcheck -c ho
On 2006.07.03 23:05, Paul Bijnens wrote:
> 30 seconds timeout without receiving anything is typical when you
> have "wait=no" instead of "wait=yes" for the amanda service.
>
> Have a careful check of the xinetd conf parameters there.
Thanks for the tip, but xinetd and launchd are both set up to w
> I've recently tried to set up my OS X (10.4.7) laptop to backup to my
> Amanda server running Gentoo. My Amanda server has been backing itself
> up without any problems for a while now. However, when I run amcheck,
> it times out trying to contact my laptop:
Are you sure that thereis no firewa
> On 2006.07.04 09:04, Olivier Nicole wrote:
> Are you sure that thereis no firewall on the laptop that would block
> Amanda packets? Or a TCP wrapper?
>
> I'd go to the log of the system and try to find any message that could
> be related to the IP or the name of your server and saying that
> som
29 matches
Mail list logo
