[EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit sur 17/08/2006
23:08:49 :
On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 04:20:33PM +0200, Cyrille Bollu wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit sur 17/08/2006 15:03:28
:
On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 10:29:46AM +0200, Cyrille Bollu
wrote:
Hi all,
I'm running a configuration without
Thks a lot, the problem was that I haven't rebuilt amanda-common with
the wrapper path on my client, but just rebuilt amanda-client. It works
now with tar.
Usually it should be enough to recompile the client part?
Now I have to script in order to replace tar arguments by star arguments...
on Thu, 17 Aug 2006 19:32:29 EDT
Jon LaBadie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 11:15:21PM +0200, Charles Stroom wrote:
Hi all,
I have recently installed Amanda version 2.5.1b1 on my SuSE 10.0 PC,
via an binary rpm. After some struggling, I start to understand
how it
Hi all!
I've configured on my server host a tape device and i want to backup
only my server host so i have configured in it the amanda server and
client. When i execute the command amcheck DiariaPrueba like amanda
user the system tells me: (DiariaPrueba is the name of my configuration)
Hi! in my .amandahosts i have this:
localhost amanda
localhost root
localhost.localdomain amanda
and in the last amcheck.xxx.debug i have:
amcheck: debug 1 pid 6162 ruid 33 euid 0: start at Fri Aug 18
13:55:56 2006
amcheck: dgram_bind: socket bound to 0.0.0.0.734
Hi! in my .amandahosts i have this:
localhost amanda
localhost root
localhost.localdomain amanda
and in the last amcheck.xxx.debug i have:
amcheck: debug 1 pid 6162 ruid 33 euid 0: start at Fri Aug 18
13:55:56 2006
amcheck: dgram_bind: socket bound to 0.0.0.0.734
amcheck:
Hi! in my .amandahosts i have this:
localhost amanda
localhost root
localhost.localdomain amanda
and in the last amcheck.xxx.debug i have:
amcheck: debug 1 pid 6162 ruid 33 euid 0: start at Fri Aug 18
13:55:56 2006
amcheck: dgram_bind: socket bound to 0.0.0.0.734
amcheck: pid
Sorry for the length of the email, but it's been a bit difficult to
explain everything... :-)
Hi there,
I'm wondering which is the best backup technique that I can implement
on a Linux-only servers production environment.
I was wondering initially, also under suggestion of some colleagues, to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit sur 18/08/2006
15:06:48 :
Sorry for the length of the email, but it's been a bit difficult to
explain everything... :-)
Hi there,
I'm wondering which is the best backup technique that I can
implement
on a Linux-only servers production environment.
I was
On 2006-08-18 14:03, Natalia García Nebot wrote:
Amanda Backup Client Hosts Check
WARNING: localhost: selfcheck request timed out. Host down?
Client check: 1 host checked in 29.996 seconds, 1 problem found
(brought to you by Amanda 2.4.4p3)
Let's keep the other amanda users informed
as I might say stupid things :-)
- Réacheminé par Cyrille
Bollu/FHQ/USERS/FEDASIL le 18/08/2006 15:51 -
Cyrille Bollu/FHQ/USERS/FEDASIL a écrit sur 18/08/2006
15:50:41 :
Fabio Corazza [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit sur 18/08/2006 15:33:19
:
Cyrille Bollu wrote:
No. Amanda does not allow appending dumps on a same cartidge. That's by
design.
Neither can I put all the full dumps into the same cartridge? Since full
dumping a server would require around 10/20GB, the cartridge would be
almost empty!
I think it's possible to run an
Charles Stroom
email: charles at stremen dot xs4all dot nl
--- Original Message
on Fri, 18 Aug 2006 08:33:08 EDT
Gene Heskett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday 18 August 2006 05:38, Charles Stroom wrote:
on Thu, 17 Aug 2006 19:32:29 EDT
Jon LaBadie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On
[EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit sur 18/08/2006
16:06:45 :
Cyrille Bollu wrote:
No. Amanda does not allow appending dumps on a same cartidge.
That's by
design.
Neither can I put all the full dumps into the same cartridge? Since
full
dumping a server would require around 10/20GB, the cartridge
On 2006-08-18 16:06, Fabio Corazza wrote:
Cyrille Bollu wrote:
No. Amanda does not allow appending dumps on a same cartidge. That's by
design.
Neither can I put all the full dumps into the same cartridge? Since full
dumping a server would require around 10/20GB, the cartridge would be
almost
Hello!
I'm planning to upgrade my Amanda server (currently 2.4.5) to 2.5.0p2.
I'm wondering whether GNU tar 1.13.25 is still officially considered a
good version, or is it absolutely required to upgrade to 1.15.1?
I noticed that when installing Amanda from FreeBSD ports, the
installation
Toomas,
GNU tar 1.13 should be good; The real troublemaker is tar 1.14, which will
silently corrupt your archives and throw away data. Unfortunately, some
distributions patch their tar with other code, so some versions of tar 1.13
are problematic, whereas some versions of tar 1.14 are
Hello Jean-François,
I changed the SCSI card. Upon investigation I found that the Qlogic
card (QLA1240D) driver in Linux too flaky for my taste. Instead I got
a couple of used DualPort-Adaptec HVD cards that work just great
(AHA-3944AUWD) from eBay ;-)
I also had to change de default
Ian Turner wrote:
On Friday 18 August 2006 11:35, Toomas Aas wrote:
BTW, I currently use dump for backups, so gtar is only used for indexes.
No, Amanda will even use dump to generate indices. So actually you don't need
tar at all.
Of course, what was I thinking.
On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 02:06:48PM +0100, Fabio Corazza wrote:
Sorry for the length of the email, but it's been a bit difficult to
explain everything... :-)
Followed by a long-winded answer without apologies.
Hi there,
I'm wondering which is the best backup technique that I can
Hello everyone, I'm attempting to set up amanda on my YDL 4.1 XServe
G5. I've compiled the app and everything seems well. I have
modified the kernel (according to Overland) so that my tape library
(Overland Loaderxpress with 1 LTO-3 drive, 11 slot tape). Heres the
output of some stuff.
On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 12:13:22PM -0500, Nick Jones wrote:
Hello everyone, I'm attempting to set up amanda on my YDL 4.1 XServe
G5. I've compiled the app and everything seems well. I have
modified the kernel (according to Overland) so that my tape library
(Overland Loaderxpress with 1
I can use mtx to get tape status. I have not tried to load or unload
a tape. Basically, assuming everything works and the problem lies
with amanda, how do I use amtapetype? What device do I use?
Last login: Fri Aug 18 13:40:00 2006 from adams.gige.uiowa.edu
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# mtx -f
On Fri, 18 Aug 2006 at 2:45pm, Nick Jones wrote
I can use mtx to get tape status. I have not tried to load or unload
a tape. Basically, assuming everything works and the problem lies
with amanda, how do I use amtapetype? What device do I use?
Last login: Fri Aug 18 13:40:00 2006 from
On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 02:45:27PM -0500, Nick Jones wrote:
I can use mtx to get tape status. I have not tried to load or unload
a tape. Basically, assuming everything works and the problem lies
with amanda, how do I use amtapetype? What device do I use?
Last login: Fri Aug 18 13:40:00
On Friday 18 August 2006 11:35, Toomas Aas wrote:
Hello!
I'm planning to upgrade my Amanda server (currently 2.4.5) to 2.5.0p2.
I'm wondering whether GNU tar 1.13.25 is still officially considered a
good version, or is it absolutely required to upgrade to 1.15.1?
I noticed that when installing
On Friday 18 August 2006 12:01, Ian Turner wrote:
Toomas,
GNU tar 1.13 should be good;
No Ian, plain 1.13 is broken, 1.13-19, 1.13-25, and 1.15-1 are the known
good versions.
The real troublemaker is tar 1.14, which
will silently corrupt your archives and throw away data. Unfortunately,
27 matches
Mail list logo
