So, if I have a dump where every item is the same priority, and the
complete dump takes 4 tapes, what happens if I set runtapes to '2'?
Will it fail gracefully, filling 2 tapes with half(-ish) the data one
pass and the other half the next, or will it fail in such a way that I
need to amflush after
Hi,
So, if I have a dump where every item is the same priority, and the
complete dump takes 4 tapes, what happens if I set runtapes to '2'?
Will it fail gracefully, filling 2 tapes with half(-ish) the data one
pass and the other half the next, or will it fail in such a way that I
need to amflus
On Wed, Dec 06, 2006 at 04:33:16PM -0600, Evan Harris wrote:
>
> Debian testing, SDLT 110/220, Intel P4 2.8Ghz 3gig RAM. Amanda 2.5.1p1-2.
>
> The holding disk is a dedicated PATA IDE drive (master) on its own
> cable/bus (no slave). The tape drive is on its own SCSI bus (no other
> devices).
Hello list - thanks for your help in the past - I now have my amanda
configuration running stably on a subset of my partitions with my 8-tape
changer for a few weeks without trouble. I've tested file recovery with
amrecover and all is good.
I only have one last hurdle to overcome before I c
I am NOT peaking at 10MB/sec from the amdump report, the 10MB/sec figure is
from several amtapetest runs, as well as my own manual testing with dd.
I KNOW the tape is shoe-shining, both because I can HEAR it consistently
having to reposition the tape every few seconds, and because I'm only
g
Hello!
I am running Debian testing. Upon initial upgrade to 2.5.1p1, amanda
would not get ACKs from any machines. I ended up downloading a new
amanda 2.5.1p1 debian package and reinstalling. I now have no problems
getting to Linux machines, but am unable to reach windows machines via
samba.
Evan,
On Thu, Dec 07, 2006 at 03:39:05PM -0600, Evan Harris wrote:
>
> I am NOT peaking at 10MB/sec from the amdump report, the 10MB/sec figure is
> from several amtapetest runs, as well as my own manual testing with dd.
>
> I KNOW the tape is shoe-shining, both because I can HEAR it consisten
On Thu, Dec 07, 2006 at 02:20:40PM -0700, Ryan Castleberry enlightened us:
> I am running Debian testing. Upon initial upgrade to 2.5.1p1, amanda
> would not get ACKs from any machines. I ended up downloading a new
> amanda 2.5.1p1 debian package and reinstalling. I now have no problems
> gettin
On Thu, 7 Dec 2006, Brian Cuttler wrote:
I've assumed that the spindle the amanda work area is on was dedicated
to the work area and not split, I know nothing about the architecture
That is correct. That disk is only used by amanda.
of the specific system bus. If you are able to get throug
Hi,
I just tried the amreport command and it looks like it is not
providing the proper result.
The email it generated was that the results were missing for every
client and in the summary the line I kept is was repeated for every
client too.
I checked and indeed there is no log file in the
10 matches
Mail list logo
