Frank,
> Do you have a duplex mismatch or other errors on the network interface
> or switch port?
No error visible.
A manual transfer was also very slow, a reboot of the machine solved
that.
> Are you seeing any system messages about read errors on your disks?
> Have you recently changed OS/ker
Greetings;
I saw this go by during the build, does it mean anything?
Name "main::include_list" used only once: possible typo at amgtar line 50.
Name "main::ksize" used only once: possible typo at amgtar line 263.
Name "main::opt_record" used only once: possible typo at amgtar line 236.
Name "main
Pieter Bowman wrote:
This is the case on both IRIX and OSF/1. These compilers can't
handle:
#define vstrallocf(...) debug_vstrallocf(__FILE__,__LINE__,__VA_ARGS__)
I fix it in the 2.5.2 tree, but the next release will require that
syntax, which is in the C99 standard.
Do you have
In working on cleaning up the amanda codebase, I discovered that at
least some of the db-based infofile backends (--with-db=gdbm, ndbm, db,
dbm) probably don't work. I talked with Jean-Louis Martineau, and he
mentioned that they have been deprecated for a long time in favor of the
text database.
Hello,
i have a working Amanda configuration which backup on DVD-RAM. (its like
writing on a hard disk)
The disks are all smaller than 4.3 GB, so a backup is no problem.
But what happens if on disk gets greater than 4.3 GB?
Can Amanda handle it, and ask for a second DVD to write the dumps on, or
Can someone please help me?
Steven Settlemyre wrote:
I haven't changed my configs for months and things were running great
until last week. Since last tues, none of my dailies have finished,
and last night a monthly failed.
Looking through the logs I see the problem always seems to start with
On Wednesday 09 May 2007, Steven Settlemyre wrote:
>Can someone please help me?
>
>Steven Settlemyre wrote:
>> I haven't changed my configs for months and things were running great
>> until last week. Since last tues, none of my dailies have finished,
>> and last night a monthly failed.
>>
>> Looki
Replying to myself:
It's my second attempt at trying to get any input as to how difficult it may
be to upgrade amanda. I have not received any reply on both occasions.
Are my questions too dumb ? I would like to read some sort of upgrade
guide, but I can't find anything useful in the doc or in
Hi,
I am considering replacement for my Amanda server, the guy has been in
production for about 6 years now and I want to be ready for the time
when the tape drive will die.
We currently use SLR100, wich is fine, very little tape failure, but
tapes are expensive, a 50 GB (native) 100 GB (compress
On Wed, May 09, 2007 at 09:38:20PM -0400, Guy Dallaire wrote:
> Replying to myself:
>
> It's my second attempt at trying to get any input as to how difficult it may
> be to upgrade amanda. I have not received any reply on both occasions.
>
> Are my questions too dumb ? I would like to read some
Hi,
It is actually quite simply to upgrade amanda. All you need to do is to
download the latest version of Amanda (for this case amanda 2.5.2),
untar it and execute the following commands to clean and recompile the
latest build.
make distclean
./configure -with-tcpportrange=5,50100 --with-udp
On Wed, May 09, 2007 at 09:38:20PM -0400, Guy Dallaire wrote:
>2.5 seems pretty scary. I see a lot of problems on the list. Is it
>stable, or is it experimental ?
2.5.2 is a stable release. A lot of the recent problems have been small
bugs that occurred in configurations not tested during
On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 08:59:40AM +0700, Olivier Nicole wrote:
> Could anyone advise on some disk tray solution that is stong and
> reliable and will handle a lot of manipulation. idealy I wouldbe
> looking at one tray bay and 5 or 6 trays for the disks.
I think your best bet may be a set of Fire
13 matches
Mail list logo
