Hello!
My Amanda setup is 2.5.1p2 on a single FreeBSD 6.2 server backing up
only itself to vtapes using GNU tar 1.15.1. It has been running well for
over 6 months, but then I screwed things up by splitting up a large DLE
into two smaller ones.
Initially I had in my disklist:
hostname.com /s
On Tue, Jun 26, 2007 at 10:29:45AM -0700, Don Murray wrote:
>
Just a couple of minor things, but if it ain't broke, don't fix it.
>
> I'm going to ignore your details and key on the concept : you want to
> have a weekly and a daily back up.
>
> I wanted to do this too and went down the path
* Joshua Baker-LePain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20070626 13:49]:
> On Tue, 26 Jun 2007 at 12:57pm, Jean-Francois Malouin wrote
>
> >I'll just add that you must also configure amanda such that both
> >configs use different ports with '--with-testing=config1'
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> I wanted to do this too and went down the path of investigating multiple
> configurations like you are doing. But it really bugged me that I have
> to basically do 2 level-0 backups a week, one for the weekly and one for
> the daily (since the dail
Matt, thank you for your help. I didn't think that I had
ip_conntrack_amanda, so I was trying to set it up without it. When I
tried your way, it worked like a charm.
Note to archive readers: I think it's important to insert the line:
-A INPUT -s 192.168.1.1 -d 192.168.1.30 -p udp -m udp --dport 10
Hi Harald,
I'm going to ignore your details and key on the concept : you want to
have a weekly and a daily back up.
I wanted to do this too and went down the path of investigating multiple
configurations like you are doing. But it really bugged me that I have
to basically do 2 level-0 back
On Tue, 26 Jun 2007 at 12:57pm, Jean-Francois Malouin wrote
I'll just add that you must also configure amanda such that both
configs use different ports with '--with-testing=config1' and
'--with-testing=config2' and add those to /etc/services like
amanda-config110080/tcp
amanda-config11
* Joshua Baker-LePain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20070626 12:32]:
> On Tue, 26 Jun 2007 at 4:58pm, Weber, Philip wrote
>
> >Is it possible to have 2 configs using 2 separate drives in a tape
> >robot, i.e. can they share the changer interface? I don't mean use of
> &
Hello again.
In my struggle to get a working amanda config (working for my strange
setup :)
I reached the following decision:
I'll use two configs,
- "Weekly", which does level-0 dumps to tape (using chg-zd-mtx)
- "Daily", which does incrementals to a virtual tape on disk
(using chg-disk)
As it
On Tuesday 26 June 2007 11:58:00 Weber, Philip wrote:
> Is it possible to have 2 configs using 2 separate drives in a tape
> robot, i.e. can they share the changer interface? I don't mean use of
> RAIT.
The answer to your question is yes, but you must ensure that only one instance
of mtx is runn
On Tue, 26 Jun 2007 at 4:58pm, Weber, Philip wrote
Is it possible to have 2 configs using 2 separate drives in a tape
robot, i.e. can they share the changer interface? I don't mean use of
RAIT.
I have successfully set up 1 config with chg-zd-mtx & then tried
duplicating that to a 2nd config us
Hi,
Is it possible to have 2 configs using 2 separate drives in a tape
robot, i.e. can they share the changer interface? I don't mean use of
RAIT.
I have successfully set up 1 config with chg-zd-mtx & then tried
duplicating that to a 2nd config using chg-zd-mtx with a different set
of tapes in t
On Tue, Jun 26, 2007 at 10:38:33AM -0400, Zembower, Kevin enlightened us:
> Kevin, thanks so much. You were right on the money. Disabling the
> firewall completely allow amcheck to work correctly.
>
> If you have some additional patience, I could use a hand trying to
> configure the firewall rules
Kevin, thanks so much. You were right on the money. Disabling the
firewall completely allow amcheck to work correctly.
If you have some additional patience, I could use a hand trying to
configure the firewall rules correctly on my amanda client. I tried to
follow the directions at
http://wiki.zman
Fellow AMANDA users,
In the past, I remember seeing something about AMANDA having trouble
when there are a large number of disklist entries. First, am I
remembering correctly, and second what constitutes a "large number"
of entries? My current backup plan is to have about 1500-2000 entries
On Tue, Jun 26, 2007 at 09:29:52AM +0200, Paul Bijnens wrote:
> I'm not 100% certain, but I believe you may even erase (some of) the
> holdingdisk files, without flushing. I think that Amanda will take into
> account that the holdingdisk file disappeared, and schedule the same
> incremental level a
On 2007-06-26 09:17, Gene Heskett wrote:
> Greetings folks;
>
> from /tmp/amanda-dbg/amandad/tonights file:
> -
> amandad: time 0.220: try_socksize: receive buffer size is 65536
> amandad: time 0.220: stream_server: waiting for connection: ::.41697
> amandad: time 0.220: se
On 2007-06-25 22:43, Chris Hoogendyk wrote:
>
> Jon LaBadie wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 25, 2007 at 12:43:50PM -0400, Chris Hoogendyk wrote:
>> ...
>>
>>> then I created a dumptype that was the same as my regular dumps but with
>>>
>>> record no
>>> strategy incronly
Instead of making it a different
Greetings folks;
from /tmp/amanda-dbg/amandad/tonights file:
-
amandad: time 0.220: try_socksize: receive buffer size is 65536
amandad: time 0.220: stream_server: waiting for connection: ::.41697
amandad: time 0.220: sending REP pkt:
<
CONNECT DATA 44889 MESG 54361 INDE
19 matches
Mail list logo
