Re: Just for completeness...

2007-12-21 Thread Ryan Steele
Dustin, Sorry then, for the duplicates you all must have received. My intent wasn't to badger you all with requests until I received a response, rather to be crystal clear (with as much detail as necessary, the lack of which in my previous posts I felt may have been hindering feedback) about

Re: Just for completeness...

2007-12-21 Thread Dustin J. Mitchell
On Dec 20, 2007 10:47 AM, Ryan Steele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have posted all the information I have on the issue at > http://forums.zmanda.com/showthread.php?t=948 > > I want to be absolutely, unequivocally sure before I contact the > developers list to ask them why amrestore is less effici

Re: automount and raw devices

2007-12-21 Thread Jean-Francois Malouin
* Jean-Louis Martineau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20071220 15:57]: > Tim, > > Amanda add the 'r'. > > It's historical, it try to be smart and do the following conversion. > /dev/sd0a -> /dev/rsd0a > /dev/dsk/c0t0d0s0 -> /dev/rdsk/c0t0d0s0 -> /dev/dsk/rc0t0d0s0 > Because DUMP works with the raw device,

Re: file changed as we read it

2007-12-21 Thread Matt Hyclak
On Fri, Dec 21, 2007 at 09:29:34AM -0700, ghe enlightened us: > On Dec 21, 2007, at 8:12 AM, Chris Hoogendyk wrote: > > >Charles Curley wrote: > >> > > >>An excludes file. > > >I got the sense that he wanted to back them up. > > Yes, I do. > > >I get around that problem by using snapshots. But

Re: automount and raw devices

2007-12-21 Thread Jean-Louis Martineau
Jean-Francois Malouin wrote: * Jean-Louis Martineau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20071220 15:57]: Tim, Amanda add the 'r'. It's historical, it try to be smart and do the following conversion. /dev/sd0a -> /dev/rsd0a /dev/dsk/c0t0d0s0 -> /dev/rdsk/c0t0d0s0 -> /dev/dsk/rc0t0d0s0 Because DUMP works wi

Re: file changed as we read it

2007-12-21 Thread ghe
On Dec 21, 2007, at 8:12 AM, Chris Hoogendyk wrote: Charles Curley wrote: An excludes file. I got the sense that he wanted to back them up. Yes, I do. I get around that problem by using snapshots. But I'm on Solaris 9, where I have fssnap and a wrapper so that when Amanda calls ufs

Re: file changed as we read it

2007-12-21 Thread Chris Hoogendyk
Charles Curley wrote: On Thu, Dec 20, 2007 at 10:06:57AM -0700, Glenn English wrote: (Debian binary Amanda install, tar, Linux) One of the things I back up is the DMZ logging server's /var/log directory. The backup fails fairly pretty regularly because that's a very busy place, even in the

Re: I want to make the shell script to judge the amdump Success or Failed with no mail.

2007-12-21 Thread Dustin J. Mitchell
On Dec 21, 2007 8:26 AM, Yoshihiro Ishikawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So, my question is what is the best solution to judge the ※"last amdump > result" Success or Failed with no mail. > ※"last amdump result" is the adjacent amdump result. > > First of all,I checked the amadmin command(amadmin Da

I want to make the shell script to judge the amdump Success or Failed with no mail.

2007-12-21 Thread Yoshihiro Ishikawa
Hello list, my English is bad, so I want your amnesty. I used - Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 5 (Tikanga) build: VERSION="Amanda-2.5.0p2" BUILT_DATE="Tue Dec 11 14:10:30 JST 2007" -- So, my question is what is the best solu