RE: Amanda 2.5.0 spanning

2008-06-09 Thread Johan Booysen
Ok, on Thurday night at 21:00 I kicked off a backup job that should span over 2 tapes. I wasn't in the office on Friday, but this morning the first tape was ejected, and amstatus tells me the following: server:/whatever/clients 0127494663k writing to tape (9:43:32) I believe then that amanda

Re: Amanda 2.5.0 spanning

2008-06-09 Thread Jean-Louis Martineau
Johan Booysen wrote: Ok, on Thurday night at 21:00 I kicked off a backup job that should span over 2 tapes. I wasn't in the office on Friday, but this morning the first tape was ejected, and amstatus tells me the following: server:/whatever/clients 0127494663k writing to tape (9:43:32) I

RE: Amanda 2.5.0 spanning

2008-06-09 Thread Johan Booysen
Yes, they are the last lines in changer.debug. Unfortunately no times or dates are recorded. I can't really see if the tape drive is writing anything. Usually it has a little light on it that flickers when there's activity, but now it's just shining all the time and that's no good. Is there

Re: Amanda 2.5.0 spanning

2008-06-09 Thread Jean-Louis Martineau
Is it adding new lines to changer.debug? If yes, then something is buggy, try to kill the script: kill 11652 Jean-Louis Johan Booysen wrote: Yes, they are the last lines in changer.debug. Unfortunately no times or dates are recorded. I can't really see if the tape drive is writing anything.

RE: Amanda 2.5.0 spanning

2008-06-09 Thread Johan Booysen
Hi, No - it's doing absolutely nothing at all. I did a tail -f on the file but it hasn't changed since almost an hour ago. Last timestamp on the file is Jun 6 12:12, anyway. Oh dear... :( -Original Message- From: Jean-Louis Martineau [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 09 June 2008

Re: Day '31' out of range 1..30 at /usr/sbin/amstatus line 1148

2008-06-09 Thread Dominik Schips
Hello Jean-Louis, Am Mittwoch, den 04.06.2008, 20:07 +0200 schrieb Dominik Schips: Hello Jean-Louis, Am Mittwoch, den 04.06.2008, 09:34 -0400 schrieb Jean-Louis Martineau: A bug in amstatus should not prevent your backup to run correctly. Changing amdump.1 can't help to start a backup run

Re: Amanda 2.5.0 spanning

2008-06-09 Thread Chris Hoogendyk
Don't know if this will be considered helpful, but . . . Back when I had to deal with manual tape changing and spanning, we made a point of scheduling the backups so that the first tape would complete, and the request for the second would occur, when someone had arrived at work and could do

RE: Amanda 2.5.0 spanning

2008-06-09 Thread Johan Booysen
Thanks for your reply. I'll have a couple more tries and see if I can figure things out. Maybe this time I should use the latest Amanda version as opposed to the latest Red Hat Amanda version... I'll let everyone know if I can resolve this, for future reference. Thanks again. -Original

[Amanda-users] confusing problem with NO-NEW-TAPE

2008-06-09 Thread nbarss
Can you send your whole amflush log, as well as the taper debug log? Sure. Here is amflush.1, taper.20080609100127.debug follows: amdump#58; start at Mon Jun 9 10#58;01#58;26 MDT 2008 amdump#58; datestamp 20080609 amdump#58; starttime 20080609100126 amdump#58; starttime-locale

Re: [Amanda-users] confusing problem with NO-NEW-TAPE

2008-06-09 Thread Jean-Louis Martineau
is amflush.1, taper.20080609100127.debug follows: amdump#58; start at Mon Jun 9 10#58;01#58;26 MDT 2008 amdump#58; datestamp 20080609 amdump#58; starttime 20080609100126 amdump#58; starttime-locale-independent 2008-06-09 10#58;01#58;26 MDT planner#58; pid 31982 executable /usr/libexec/amanda/planner

Re: Amanda 2.5.0 spanning

2008-06-09 Thread Jon LaBadie
Johaan, I looked back over the postings in this thread but may have missed the answer to this question. Have you exercised your chg-manual script with the amtape command? Everything I see is the result of amdump/amcheck runs which adds a layer of complexity to seeing if your changer script is

Re: Another amanda-client.conf not found thread

2008-06-09 Thread Dustin J. Mitchell
On Sun, Jun 8, 2008 at 11:13 PM, Dustin J. Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This is a result of an error-messaging bug in the 2.6.0. Basically, config error messages go to stderr, which xinetd routes to the server. The bug has been fixed in trunk, but on double-checking, it hasn't been

dumper abort()ing occasionally

2008-06-09 Thread Douglas K. Rand
Once or twice a week my amanda backups are failing when a dumper exits on signal 6, SIGABRT: Jun 5 23:27:38 scotch kernel: pid 82566 (dumper), uid 0: exited on signal 6 Jun 8 19:53:43 scotch kernel: pid 96672 (dumper), uid 0: exited on signal 6 In looking at the source there clearly are

Re: dumper abort()ing occasionally

2008-06-09 Thread Ian Turner
Douglas, Are there any details regarding this issue in the /tmp/amanda debug files for this dumper? --Ian On Monday 09 June 2008 17:11:51 Douglas K. Rand wrote: Once or twice a week my amanda backups are failing when a dumper exits on signal 6, SIGABRT: Jun 5 23:27:38 scotch kernel:

Re: dumper abort()ing occasionally

2008-06-09 Thread Douglas K. Rand
Ian Are there any details regarding this issue in the /tmp/amanda Ian debug files for this dumper? Nothing that I saw. Here is the dumper.*.debug file for that pid. I also uploaded all of the debug files for that run from the server to: http://meridian-enviro.com/rand/amanda/ dumper: debug 1

Expecting new tape...

2008-06-09 Thread Robert Kuropkat
Did something bad, but not sure what. I had a tape with a bar code label but apparently no Amanda label. So I labeled it and hoped the next backup would write to it. It did not. It was tape #28 and I had already passed that number in the sequence (Tape #30). So I figured I did something