From: Paul Yeatman Sent: August 19, 2009 20:06
Are you using dump (instead of tar) per chance? If so, try using the
device name instead of the mount point. If using LVM, this is the
full LVM device name, ie. /dev/mapper/VolGroup00-LogVol00
Hi Paul:
For this particular entry I am using
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 10:39:45AM -0400, Jean-Louis Martineau wrote:
stan wrote:
I know I have asked this before, but I can't recall getting a definative
answer. Is port usage different between 2.5.x and 2.6 clients, when
talkimng to a 2.6 server?
No, the same port are used if
I recently tried to upgrade several of my OpenBSD machines to 4.5 (X86). I
also upgraded the Amanda clients on them to 2.6.1, which I have working on
FreeBSD, Linux, Solaris 5, Solaris 8, and HP-UX.
Despite my best efforts, I have yet to get the OpenBSD 4.5 clients to back
up correctly. All the
stan wrote:
I recently tried to upgrade several of my OpenBSD machines to 4.5 (X86). I
also upgraded the Amanda clients on them to 2.6.1, which I have working on
FreeBSD, Linux, Solaris 5, Solaris 8, and HP-UX.
Despite my best efforts, I have yet to get the OpenBSD 4.5 clients to back
up
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 12:54:06PM -0400, Chris Hoogendyk wrote:
stan wrote:
I recently tried to upgrade several of my OpenBSD machines to 4.5 (X86). I
also upgraded the Amanda clients on them to 2.6.1, which I have working on
FreeBSD, Linux, Solaris 5, Solaris 8, and HP-UX.
Despite my
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 12:54:06PM -0400, Chris Hoogendyk wrote:
stan wrote:
I recently tried to upgrade several of my OpenBSD machines to 4.5 (X86). I
also upgraded the Amanda clients on them to 2.6.1, which I have working on
FreeBSD, Linux, Solaris 5, Solaris 8, and HP-UX.
Despite my
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 10:39:45AM -0400, Jean-Louis Martineau wrote:
stan wrote:
I know I have asked this before, but I can't recall getting a definative
answer. Is port usage different between 2.5.x and 2.6 clients, when
talkimng to a 2.6 server?
No, the same port are used if
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 12:54:06PM -0400, Chris Hoogendyk wrote:
stan wrote:
Has anyone gotten an newer version of Amanda to work on OpenBSD 4.5? Can
anyone suggest what I should do to try to diagnose this problem further?
Sounds like you've had a fair bit of experience on various
Hello...
On Wed, 2009-08-19 at 17:51 -0700, Hugh E Cruickshank wrote:
Amanda 2.6.1p1 on RHEL 5.3
Hi All:
I am attempting to add the following entries to an exiting disklist
file:
pgips2 /always-full
pgips2 /bootalways-full
When I run the amcheck I get
Hi there,
I am still trying to get to the bottom of this.
I have some servers running Debian Etch. They have been fine with amanda
for a very long time now.
I just ran an apt-get upgrade to apply some security patches and suddenly
I'm getting the old file changed as we read it and error
10 matches
Mail list logo
