Amanda users,
Dustin,
Jean-Louis,
We have updated amanda to Amanda-2.6.1p1-20091023 and applied
a patch for zfs-snapshot names within disklist globs.
We have run 2 nights with this config where client!=server
but both are Solaris 10/x86, both running the same amanda version.
We are 0 for 2 on
Brian,
Post the amandad.*.debug file form finsen.
Jean-Louis
Brian Cuttler wrote:
Amanda users,
Dustin,
Jean-Louis,
We have updated amanda to Amanda-2.6.1p1-20091023 and applied
a patch for zfs-snapshot names within disklist globs.
We have run 2 nights with this config where client!=server
Jean-Louis,
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 10:50:43AM -0400, Jean-Louis Martineau wrote:
With this patch, you will get the error reported by sendsize.
So the error will be more explicite - or will the additional info
help amanda development ?
You still have the same problem, the UDP packet is too
Great, thank you very much!
Brian
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 11:07:09AM -0400, Jean-Louis Martineau wrote:
Brian Cuttler wrote:
Jean-Louis,
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 10:50:43AM -0400, Jean-Louis Martineau wrote:
With this patch, you will get the error reported by sendsize.
So the
Brian Cuttler wrote:
Jean-Louis,
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 10:50:43AM -0400, Jean-Louis Martineau wrote:
With this patch, you will get the error reported by sendsize.
So the error will be more explicite - or will the additional info
help amanda development ?
The error will be more
With this patch, you will get the error reported by sendsize.
You still have the same problem, the UDP packet is too big. You are
using the 'bsd' auth, it use UDP and is limited in the packet size.
Use must use a tcp based 'auth', either bsdtcp, ssh or rsh.
Jean-Louis
Brian Cuttler wrote:
Alan,
Most people report faster throughput without nfs, your result is weird.
Your sample is small (1.5GB), is it possible it was cached by the nfs
client?
Do amanda and NFS use the same network route?
Do the NFS server have enough memory and cpu to run the amanda client
software?
Check the
