Re: Strange behaviour by amanda/tape device

2005-08-18 Thread Chris Loken
Are there any tape errors in the system log? I run into this type of problem when, somehow, the blocksize of the tape drive is changed. Then amanda will run through the whole set of tapes and reject them all while the system log shows kernel: st0: Incorrect block size. each time a tape is

Re: [off-topip] Better Backup Media

2005-06-21 Thread Chris Loken
Brandon D. Valentine wrote: AIT-4 sure looks pretty though. We've used AIT-3 for a couple of years and AIT-4 for 6-months or so. No significant problems. BUT - my AIT-4 drive apparently can't even read AIT-3 tapes. Seems mind-bogglingly stupid but my vendor assures me it's true

sendbackup speed issue

2005-06-06 Thread Chris Loken
written: 42903377920 (40GB, 1.2MB/s) -- Chris Loken Phone: 416-978-5619 Computing Facility Manager Fax: 416-978-3921 Canadian Institute for Theoretical Astrophysics

Re: sendbackup speed issue

2005-06-06 Thread Chris Loken
backup for these particular configs. Chris Paul Bijnens wrote: Chris Loken wrote: I have one amanda server and one client. I have 2 separate amanda configs to backup different DLEs on the client. The problem is that backups with one config seem to be much slower than the other

amanda tape use strategy

2004-12-07 Thread Chris Loken
Apologies if this has come up before. Couldn't find anything relevant. I'm talking about level 0 dumps (not incrementals). Using ait-3 tapes, GNUTAR (not linux dump), a tape library, 104GB holding disk and setting runtapes greater than 1 (I need to dump several tapes-worth of data). NO

Re: amanda tape use strategy

2004-12-07 Thread Chris Loken
(if compression is off this should be very clear). A closer look at the man page confirms this. Oh well. Thanks for the responses! Chris Paul Bijnens wrote: Chris Loken wrote: Apologies if this has come up before. Couldn't find anything relevant. I'm talking about level 0 dumps (not incrementals