to hardware compression off you can rerun
tapetype to get more accurate values.
Hope it helps!
--
Conny Gyllendahl
Don't try to have the last word -- you might get it.
-- Lazarus Long
subdirectories and it appears to be working. Or maybe amanda is smarter
than me, notices it and switches them to using tar instead. :)
--
Conny Gyllendahl
His mind is like a steel trap: full of mice.
-- Foghorn Leghorn
On Fri, 16 Aug 2002, Jay Lessert wrote:
You say ufs(dump), so I'm assuming recent Solaris. The calculation
is different for Linux.
Correctamundo! Solaris 2.8 to be precise.
*snip great list of pros and cons*
Thanks for the input!
--
Conny Gyllendahl
It is not enough to have great
On Tue, 20 Aug 2002, Jon LaBadie wrote:
Alternatively, files_to_dump can identify individual
files or directories. ... This dump is equivalent
to a level 0 dump of the indicated portions of the
filesystem ...
It looks like by naming a directory you do
On Wed, 14 Aug 2002, Joshua Baker-LePain wrote:
*snip*
1000 x thanks for the help! I have Amanda up and running and backing up
our three servers just the way we wanted it now.
Now for my last question for this time: what are the pros and cons, if
any, for using tar or (ufs)dump? Are there any
Hello again everyone!
Now that I have sorted out my tapetype issue I kindly ask for some help on
configuring Amanda.
What I would like to do is:
- full backups every weekday (mon-fri)
- use 5 tapes (possibly 6)
- backup the following filesystems
host: louie filesys: /export/home/htdocs
host:
Hi all!
I have been trying to set up Amanda to back up our Solaris 8 boxes and one
of the first steps was to get a tapetype for our tapes.
The taper is reported as HP DDS-3 4MM DAT (by `mt status`). I don't know
any additonal data about this drive since it is in an unmarked case
(unless I crack
