Steven Backus wrote at 10:20 -0600 on Aug 7, 2008:
> I've determined my drive can label tapes but can't read old
> tapes. I get the Input/Output error whenever trying to read a
> previously labeled tape or dd out anything. However, if I re-label
> the tape it works again. Does this indica
Paul Bijnens wrote at 12:33 +0200 on May 27, 2008:
> On 2008-05-25 18:55, jehan procaccia wrote:
> > hello,
> >
> > some clients with "big" partitions (>100Gbytes) freezes my amdump, I
> > usually get dumps errors which cannot end properly.
> > I have 2 questions,
> > 1) how can I resolve
Dustin J. Mitchell wrote at 15:12 -0400 on May 15, 2008:
> On #amanda, I've been working with Scott Bender, who's trying to build
> Amanda-2.6.0 on HP/UX 11.11. He's gotten all of the prereqs
> installed, but is having some trouble with network communication.
>
> We've boiled the problem dow
Jon LaBadie wrote at 13:57 -0400 on Apr 25, 2008:
> Though I've not tried it, it should.
>
> I base that on the description of the command
>
> /usr/sbin/ufsdump [options] [arguments] files_to_dump
>
> and the belief that the include directive merely provides the args
> corresponding
Pieter Bowman wrote at 11:41 -0600 on Apr 25, 2008:
> The final issue I found was that the inode numbers in the snapshots
> change each time a new snapshot is created. This is a problem with
> GNU tar's listed-incremental facility. To work around this I ended up
> hacking GNU tar to make it i
Jon LaBadie wrote at 10:59 -0400 on Apr 25, 2008:
> Another way would be to use include directives. For example, if the
> zfs pool was /pool and had file systems of a, b,c, and d, you could
> set up multiple DLEs that were rooted at /pool (different tag names)
> and had include directives of "
Anthony Worrall wrote at 14:32 +0100 on Apr 25, 2008:
> unfortunately zfsdump, or "zfs send" as it is now, does not relate to
> ufsdump in any way :-(
Sorry to hijack this thread, but...
Can Solaris and/or ZFS snapshots support partial filesystem dumps (and
restores)? If not, how do people u
Oscar Ricardo Silva wrote at 18:33 -0500 on Mar 21, 2008:
> I'm attempting to compile the client version of amanda on a Dell PowerEdge
> server running FreeBSD 6.3 but keep running into an ssh related error. I
> use
> the following configure statement:
>
> ./configure --prefix=/usr/local
Jean-Louis Martineau wrote at 14:50 -0500 on Mar 6, 2008:
> By defaults, amanda will never do more than runtapes * tape_length,
> unless you set 'maxdumpsize', added in 2.4.4.
... or the estimated dump size winds up being less than the actual
dump size. But I understand your basic point.
I w
Jordan Desroches wrote at 10:09 -0500 on Jan 18, 2008:
> Greetings all,
>
> In experimenting with AMANDA I've been running into a problem where
> I'll start a backup, everything will go swimmingly, and sometime down
> the line, the backup is stopped, and no AMANDA processes are running.
John E Hein wrote at 08:53 -0700 on Jan 7, 2008:
> Dustin J. Mitchell wrote at 09:46 -0500 on Jan 7, 2008:
> > On Jan 7, 2008 9:03 AM, Mister Olli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > (gdb) bt
> > > #0 0x281ece17 in shmget () from /lib/libc.so.6
>
Dustin J. Mitchell wrote at 09:46 -0500 on Jan 7, 2008:
> On Jan 7, 2008 9:03 AM, Mister Olli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > (gdb) bt
> > #0 0x281ece17 in shmget () from /lib/libc.so.6
> > #1 0x080520f4 in attach_buffers ()
> > #2 0x0804b872 in main ()
>
> Eek -- this is where the taper
Gene Heskett wrote at 18:58 -0500 on Jan 1, 2008:
> Which of course, since Murphy is alive and well, is not included in
> any of the rpm versions of tar. Gotta love it. Is this available
> on the zmanda site someplace?
It seems that it's not in the source tarball. Sorry.
But the gtar info p
Gene Heskett wrote at 14:50 -0500 on Jan 1, 2008:
> I just got bit by the volatile device major number getting moved
> again, and one of the kernel developers is asking me how FreeBSD
> users cope with this since FreeBSD's device majors are all dynamic.
Well, it's not really the major device,
Tom Herrera wrote at 11:24 -0800 on Dec 13, 2007:
> Still curious if it is okay, amanda-wise, to just remove the ancient
> directories, or if I have to do something more than that.
Try 'amadmin holding delete ...'
(see the amadmin man page)
I think this is a new feature in amanda 2.5.2
This i
Cyrille Bollu wrote at 17:53 +0100 on Nov 22, 2007:
> is there something to do to prevent "tar" to lookup for username when it's
> estimating the size of the DLE's (like when you do "ls -ln" instead of "ls
> -l")?
>
> It seems that this process puts a very high load on my LDAP server... Suc
Marc Muehlfeld wrote at 20:32 +0100 on Nov 16, 2007:
> Hi,
>
> I saw a interesting behavier when I use amadmin to force a level 0. While
> a force to the root file system just set this one to level 0:
>
> # amadmin KDD force genome /
> amadmin: genome.mr.lfmg.de:/ is set to a forced level
Krahn, Anderson wrote at 11:56 -0500 on Oct 17, 2007:
> Does anyone know how to change the location of the gnutar-lists
> directory on the clients?
>
> By default it is asking me to create them in
>
> [can not read/write /usr/local/var/amanda/gnutar-lists/.: No such file
> or directory]
>
Olivier Nicole wrote at 15:14 +0700 on Oct 12, 2007:
> Hi,
>
> I just upgraded amanda-client and gtar:
>
> gtar-1.18_1 GNU version of the traditional tar archiver
> amanda-client-2.5.1p3_1,1 The Advanced Maryland Automatic Network Disk
> Archiver
>
> on a 5.5 server
>
> Free
Dustin J. Mitchell wrote at 21:00 -0500 on Sep 27, 2007:
> On 9/27/07, John E Hein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > And maybe adding a "devno changed" check in amcheck would be nice -
> > > > the client has the gnutar-list files, so it would requir
Dustin J. Mitchell wrote at 16:15 -0500 on Sep 27, 2007:
> On 9/27/07, John E Hein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Indeed. I was looking for the format documented in the .info
> > pages for gnutar, but couldn't find it.
[by the way, somewhere between gtar 1.15.1 and 1
Paul Bijnens wrote at 19:41 +0200 on Sep 27, 2007:
> On 2007-09-27 18:07, John E Hein wrote:
> > I can't think of any way to see if they changed - I don't have a
> > record of what they were before. Is there a way to look in the
> > gnutar-list files and see? I
John E Hein wrote at 09:43 -0600 on Sep 27, 2007:
> Dustin J. Mitchell wrote at 21:14 -0500 on Sep 26, 2007:
> > Just a guess -- is this a Linux machine that recently had hardware
> > added/removed?
>
> linux, no - freebsd. devno changes? I don't think so.
Dustin J. Mitchell wrote at 21:14 -0500 on Sep 26, 2007:
> Just a guess -- is this a Linux machine that recently had hardware
> added/removed?
linux, no - freebsd. devno changes? I don't think so. There was a
raid disk replacement. But that's a hidden device behind an LSI
Megaraid controller
Jon LaBadie wrote at 22:23 -0400 on Sep 26, 2007:
> On Wed, Sep 26, 2007 at 06:57:11PM -0600, John Hein wrote:
> > stat -x foo
> > File: "foo"
> > Size: 296422 FileType: Regular File
> > Mode: (0444/-r--r--r--) Uid: ( 631/ nrg) Gid: ( 2005/
> > web)
> > Device:
Gerhard den Hollander wrote at 12:01 +0200 on Sep 19:
> * John E Hein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Tue, Sep 18, 2001 at 09:32:57AM -0600)
> > Hmmm... it also seems to not take compression into account (we use gnu
> > tar with client side compression). The estimated size is much
Eric Nelson wrote at 14:10 -0600 on Sep 14:
> Thank you very much! We implemented the sendsize file you sent us and it has
> cut our Estimate Time in half.
Hmmm... it also seems to not take compression into account (we use gnu
tar with client side compression). The estimated size is much lar
>Date: Fri, 11 May 2001 11:08:59 -0600
>From: Paul Brannigan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: GNU tar syntax (or How does amanda do that?)
>
[snip]
> Yet when I try to do this at the command line I get
> tar complaints. Am I using the wrong syntax?
>
> solaris-host>#/usr/local/bin
28 matches
Mail list logo