(expecting a new tape?)

2005-05-27 Thread Matheson Cameron
(expecting a new tape) NOTE: skipping tape-writable test NOTE: info dir /var/lib/amanda/DailySet1/curinfo: does not exist NOTE: it will be created on the next run NOTE: index dir /var/lib/amanda/DailySet1/index/xiaohei.tonservices.com: does not exist Server check took 18.282 seconds Amanda

Q: expecting a new tape

2003-10-28 Thread Raúl Wild-Spain
Hi, Yesterday I forced a full backup with amadmin. Today, amcheck mailed to me the following: These dumps were to tape FURV-POLICY01. The next tape Amanda expects to use is: a new tape. . . NOTES: planner: Forcing full dump of xaloc:/dev/sdc2 as directed. taper: tape FURV-POLICY01 kb

Re: Q: expecting a new tape

2003-10-28 Thread Paul Bijnens
Raúl Wild-Spain wrote: Hi, Yesterday I forced a full backup with amadmin. Today, amcheck mailed to me the following: These dumps were to tape FURV-POLICY01. The next tape Amanda expects to use is: a new tape. In english (oh, or wasn't it english? :-) ) : This backup was on tape FURV-POLICY01

Re: Q: expecting a new tape

2003-10-28 Thread Joshua Baker-LePain
On Tue, 28 Oct 2003 at 9:00am, Raúl Wild-Spain wrote Yesterday I forced a full backup with amadmin. Today, amcheck mailed to me the following: amcheck didn't mail you that -- amdump did. It's just telling you what it did. The backups are fine. -- Joshua Baker-LePain Department of

Re: Tapeless error with 2.4.3 (expecting a new tape)

2002-07-31 Thread Scott Inglis
But I am not using a tape. This is all backed up to the hard drive. Is the labelstr required in this case? - Original Message - From: John Koenig [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 10:13 AM Subject: Re: Tapeless error with 2.4.3 (expecting a new tape

Re: Tapeless error with 2.4.3 (expecting a new tape)

2002-07-30 Thread John Koenig
(expecting a new tape) based on your current configuration stated above: Make as many directories as you desire inside /usr/local/amanda/backup then use a softlink named data to point to the directory that is the next tape... I created 10 dirs named slot_00, slot_01...slot_09 then I rotate

Re: Tapeless error with 2.4.3 (expecting a new tape)

2002-07-30 Thread Mozzi
: tapedev /usr/local/amanda/backup In the /usr/local/amanda/backup directory, there is a data directory. When I run amcheck backup, I get the following error: file:/usr/local/amanda/backup : not an amanda tape (expecting a new tape) based on your current configuration stated above: Make

Re: Tapeless error with 2.4.3 (expecting a new tape)

2002-07-30 Thread Scott Inglis
Koenig [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 3:19 AM Subject: Re: Tapeless error with 2.4.3 (expecting a new tape) I have amanda set up for a tapeless backup. My tapedev is set to the following: tapedev /usr/local/amanda/backup In the /usr/local/amanda

Re: Tapeless error with 2.4.3 (expecting a new tape)

2002-07-30 Thread Scott Sanders
backup, I get the following error:file:/usr/local/amanda/backup : not an amanda tape (expecting a new tape)Any ideas on fixing this problem?Thanks,Scott -- Scott Sanders Systems Administrator Concepts Direct, Inc. 2950 Colorful Ave. Longmont, CO 80504

Re: Tapeless error with 2.4.3 (expecting a new tape)

2002-07-30 Thread John Koenig
Hi John, Thanks for the response. I have also set it up the way that you are talking about but I still have the same problem. Could it be the directory names that you are using? What is your labelstr entry in your amanda.conf file set to? You may need to label your tape, next. This would not

Tapeless error with 2.4.3 (expecting a new tape)

2002-07-29 Thread Scott Inglis
un amcheck backup, I get the following error: file:/usr/local/amanda/backup: not an amanda tape (expecting a new tape) Any ideas on fixing this problem? Thanks, Scott