maybe a retension would help! just a thought :-P

On Wed, Aug 22, 2001 at 04:37:33PM +0200, Matteo Centonza wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I'm sorry for this slightly OT question.
> 
> As in subject, I've a SONY DDS2 tape drive with 90m DDS tapes which
> behaves in a very strange way. I've loaded a tape and issued:
> 
> > tar cvf /dev/nst0 /stuff
> 
> tar doesn't complains.
> 
> After, I rewind the tape, extract the archive and verified that data is
> stored correctly.
> 
> Now comes the tricky part.
> 
> If I eject the tape, Voila', the tape is unreadable. I get
> after loading the tape:
> 
> > mt -f /dev/nst0 status
> 
> SCSI 2 tape drive:
> File number=0, block number=0, partition=0.
> Tape block size 512 bytes. Density code 0x13 (DDS (61000 bpi)).
> Soft error count since last status=0
> General status bits on (41010000):
>  BOT ONLINE IM_REP_EN
> 
> > mt -f /dev/nst0 rewind (just to be sure)
> 
> > tar: /dev/nst0: Cannot read: Input/output error
> tar: At beginning of tape, quitting now
> tar: Error is not recoverable: exiting now
> 
> >  mt -f /dev/nst0 status
> 
> SCSI 2 tape drive:
> File number=0, block number=-1, partition=0.
> Tape block size 512 bytes. Density code 0x13 (DDS (61000 bpi)).
> Soft error count since last status=0
> General status bits on (1010000):
>  ONLINE IM_REP_EN
> 
> I get same  I/O error if issue  mt fsf 1  from a  rewound  tape. If I
> overwrite  the tape with a new tar i'm again able to read the content
> but unless tha  tape in not ejected.
> 
> Has anyon e seen  this before? The same kernel/st handles properly an
> SLR-100. Needless to say that i face the same problem running amcheck.
> 
> TIA for any suggestion(s),
> 
> -m
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Amanda-users mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://mail.topic.com.au/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/amanda-users

-- 
Jason Thomas                           Phone:  +61 2 6257 7111
System Administrator  -  UID 0         Fax:    +61 2 6257 7311
tSA Consulting Group Pty. Ltd.         Mobile: 0418 29 66 81
1 Hall Street Lyneham ACT 2602         http://www.topic.com.au/

Reply via email to