On Curie, I did a make clean in /tmp/ivan/amanda-261-patched/amandad-src
and then a make.
Checking ./.libs/amandad I find no evidence of the 2.4.5 library.
[curie]: /usr/tmp/ivan/amanda-261-patched/amandad-src/.libs ldd amandad |
grep liba
libamandad-2.6.1p1.so =
I'm not at all certain I understand this.
[curie] /usr/local/libexec/amanda 2 hostname
curie
[curie] /usr/local/libexec/amanda 3 pwd
curie:/usr/local/libexec/amanda
[curie] /usr/local/libexec/amanda 4 ldd amandad
libamandad-2.6.1p1.so =
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 1:22 PM, Brian Cuttlerbr...@wadsworth.org wrote:
They look like the same binary but don't act like the same binary.
This is really best handled by those who are skilled in the ways of
Solaris -- the operating system has lots of weird behaviors with
regard to linking.
Chris,
We will remove the old libraries, that should take care of it.
for completeness though, I just don't understand why
we get two different results in the same binary ?
Actually, for the binary on Curie we only search for
object=libamandad-2.6.1p1.so, where on Cascade we
seem to be
Brian Cuttler wrote:
Chris,
We will remove the old libraries, that should take care of it.
for completeness though, I just don't understand why
we get two different results in the same binary ?
Actually, for the binary on Curie we only search for
object=libamandad-2.6.1p1.so, where on
Dustin J. Mitchell wrote:
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 1:22 PM, Brian Cuttlerbr...@wadsworth.org wrote:
They look like the same binary but don't act like the same binary.
This is really best handled by those who are skilled in the ways of
Solaris -- the operating system has lots of weird
