Re: DLE too large ?

2004-02-12 Thread Stefan G. Weichinger
Hi, Brian, on Donnerstag, 12. Februar 2004 at 20:16 you wrote to amanda-users: BC> We've exceeded capacity... I'll discuss with my manager, we'll BC> have to find another drive (we don't control what's on the BC> disk volume). You don't HAVE to do that. Create DLEs that just contain subdirs of t

Re: DLE too large ?

2004-02-12 Thread Brian Cuttler
Jon, Jay, I think you both got it -- brain fry on my part and was saying "DLT 4000" and thinking "DLT 8000". We've exceeded capacity... I'll discuss with my manager, we'll have to find another drive (we don't control what's on the disk volume). tha

Re: DLE too large ?

2004-02-12 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 01:49:52PM -0500, Brian Cuttler wrote: > Hello Amanda Users, > > I'm a little baffled by this... > > Amanda 2.4.2p2 on Solaris 5.8 > > partition is 32-ish Gig > /dev/dsk/c1t10d0s0 35006272 31531391 312481991%/sambashare > > Tape is a DLT 4000, we use SW compres

DLE too large ?

2004-02-12 Thread Brian Cuttler
Hello Amanda Users, I'm a little baffled by this... Amanda 2.4.2p2 on Solaris 5.8 partition is 32-ish Gig /dev/dsk/c1t10d0s0 35006272 31531391 312481991%/sambashare Tape is a DLT 4000, we use SW compression which gave us a 20 Gig file to move to tape. I wasn't too concerned when the