Dan Brown wrote:
There is a host however in this new config whose backups magically disappear
after the first chunk. This host is a temporary copy of the old backup
host, something which will sit in the backup rotation for a month or two to
ensure we don't need any files off of the machine bef
Gene Heskett wrote:
On Monday 19 December 2005 20:35, Dan Brown wrote:
Actually, I had initially forgotten to uncomment that a couple of
days ago and gotten the dumps rejected right away. Right now, both
the 150GB and the 50GB disks are set to be filled up to capacity
-1Gb. I also have only 30
On Monday 19 December 2005 20:35, Dan Brown wrote:
>Whoops, this was meant to go to the entire list.
>
>Gene Heskett wrote:
>> On Monday 19 December 2005 17:53, Dan Brown wrote:
>>>I have recently just upgraded amanda an amanda installation from
>>>2.4.4p1 and upgraded the backup host from RedHat 7
Whoops, this was meant to go to the entire list.
Gene Heskett wrote:
On Monday 19 December 2005 17:53, Dan Brown wrote:
I have recently just upgraded amanda an amanda installation from
2.4.4p1 and upgraded the backup host from RedHat 7.3 to Fedora FC4.
I've also conglomerated the backed up h
On Monday 19 December 2005 17:53, Dan Brown wrote:
>I have recently just upgraded amanda an amanda installation from
> 2.4.4p1 and upgraded the backup host from RedHat 7.3 to Fedora FC4.
>
>I've also conglomerated the backed up hosts from several
> configurations which ran independantly of each oth
I have recently just upgraded amanda an amanda installation from 2.4.4p1 and
upgraded the backup host from RedHat 7.3 to Fedora FC4.
I've also conglomerated the backed up hosts from several configurations
which ran independantly of each other, into a single configuration which
amanda will manage
