Yes, we use amrecover frequently. When I was first starting
to become familiar with it I had a few problems, silly user
errors like not remembering the "-p" option and ended up
positioning the tape manually [well, with mt :-) ] and then
having to pipe the output of dd through gzip to {xfs|ufs}rest
On Saturday 11 January 2003 23:35, Kirk Strauser wrote:
>At 2003-01-10T23:37:49Z, David Raistrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
>> As do I.
>
>Me too
>
>So, at least for a certain set of machines, it *can* be made to
> work.
And, thanks to Jean-Louis, its working here right now, on coyote,
which i
At 2003-01-10T23:37:49Z, David Raistrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> As do I.
Me too
So, at least for a certain set of machines, it *can* be made to work.
--
Kirk Strauser
In Googlis non est, ergo non est.
msg16883/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Fri, 10 Jan 2003, Chris Dahn wrote:
> Yes, I use amrecover with indexing.
As do I.
---
david raistrick
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.expita.com/nomime.html
On Friday 10 January 2003 05:07 pm, Brashers, Bart -- MFG, Inc. wrote:
> So: does anyone out there actually use amrecover with indexing? If so,
> then I'll post a longer email with details, and perhaps I can get some help
> figuring out my problems.
Yes, I use amrecover with indexing.
-Chris
On Fri, 10 Jan 2003 at 3:07pm, Brashers, Bart -- MFG, Inc. wrote
> 501 No index records for host: foo.bar.com. Invalid?
How do you reference foo.bar.com in your disklist? Do you see the index
files in your indexdir? If you look at their contents, do they look
correct?
--
Joshua Baker-LePain
I tried to use amrecover, and ran into lots of problems. I fixed some, but
am stuck -- amrecover says
501 No index records for host: foo.bar.com. Invalid?
I searched the email archives and the web, and the end result seems to be
that people never figured this problem out, and resorted to using
