Re: Each file on Samba backup target produces NT_STATUS_OBJECT_PATH_NOT_FOUND error

2006-04-17 Thread Anne Wilson
On Monday 17 April 2006 06:02, Fran Fabrizio wrote: I just had to move to a new install of Amanda due to a crash of my backup server. The new server is using the Amanda 2.4.5p1 packages under Fedora Core 5, the old server was redhat 9 and Amanda 2.4.4p2. I copied the config from the old

Re: Each file on Samba backup target produces NT_STATUS_OBJECT_PATH_NOT_FOUND error

2006-04-17 Thread Fran Fabrizio
I think that if you google on 'NT_STATUS_OBJECT_PATH_NOT_FOUND' you will find that it is a samba problem, not an amanda one. I used to get lines similar in reports unrelated to amanda, but unfortunately I can't remember the cure. I do agree, but it appears to be with the specific manner in

Re: Each file on Samba backup target produces NT_STATUS_OBJECT_PATH_NOT_FOUND error

2006-04-17 Thread Fran Fabrizio
I did eventually find the smbclient command Amanda was using (it was in /var/log/amanda, not /var/log/amanda/mycyclename where I was looking :-) Running that command from the command line produces the same problem, so I have forwarded that to the Samba list and we'll see what comes back.

Re: Each file on Samba backup target produces NT_STATUS_OBJECT_PATH_NOT_FOUND error

2006-04-17 Thread Anne Wilson
On Monday 17 April 2006 14:12, Fran Fabrizio wrote: I did eventually find the smbclient command Amanda was using (it was in /var/log/amanda, not /var/log/amanda/mycyclename where I was looking :-) Running that command from the command line produces the same problem, so I have forwarded that

Each file on Samba backup target produces NT_STATUS_OBJECT_PATH_NOT_FOUND error

2006-04-16 Thread Fran Fabrizio
I just had to move to a new install of Amanda due to a crash of my backup server. The new server is using the Amanda 2.4.5p1 packages under Fedora Core 5, the old server was redhat 9 and Amanda 2.4.4p2. I copied the config from the old server to the new exact, and all worked fine (minus