On Sun, Dec 7, 2008 at 4:27 AM, Gerhard den Hollander
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
MOre tiem consuming ?
As in it will take 5 minutes longer to setup ?
Or as in the backups will last longer ?
Set up and maintain, yes.
Dustin
--
Storage Software Engineer
http://www.zmanda.com
I'm running out of holding disk space during the backup and I was
wondering what I can do. Here's my scenario
I've got a directory called Music that has 54GB on it. My disk has 36GB
free. I have a second disk with 34GB free on it. Can I have multiple
holding disks?
If I give the disk list as
Matt Burkhardt wrote:
I'm running out of holding disk space during the backup and I was
wondering what I can do. Here's my scenario
I've got a directory called Music that has 54GB on it. My disk has 36GB
free. I have a second disk with 34GB free on it. Can I have multiple
holding disks?
On Sat, Dec 6, 2008 at 10:57 AM, Matt Burkhardt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've got a directory called Music that has 54GB on it. My disk has 36GB
free. I have a second disk with 34GB free on it. Can I have multiple
holding disks?
Yes, you can, and that would be the easiest solution for you.
Marcus [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In amanda.conf it says
If a dump is too big to fit on the holding disk than
it will be written directly to tape.
I'm hoping to write 200g at a time to DLT, and would
like to stream it if possible. Does that mean I need
200g of holding disk? I scrounged up
In amanda.conf it says
If a dump is too big to fit on the holding disk than
it will be written directly to tape.
I'm hoping to write 200g at a time to DLT, and would
like to stream it if possible. Does that mean I need
200g of holding disk? I scrounged up 20g, but another
180g doesn't look
On Sat, 27 Aug 2005, Marcus wrote:
In amanda.conf it says
If a dump is too big to fit on the holding disk than
it will be written directly to tape.
I'm hoping to write 200g at a time to DLT, and would
like to stream it if possible. Does that mean I need
200g of holding disk?
Yep.
I
On Sat, Aug 27, 2005 at 09:49:11AM -0700, Marcus wrote:
In amanda.conf it says
If a dump is too big to fit on the holding disk than
it will be written directly to tape.
I'm hoping to write 200g at a time to DLT, and would
like to stream it if possible. Does that mean I need
200g of
LaValley, Brian E wrote:
I have a Fedora Core 3 amanda server. I have specified an nfs mounted
directory for one of the holding disks. Does anyone know why amcheck finds
much less space available on this drive than a command like 'df' does?
You need to explain a little more. amcheck checks
Paul Bijnens wrote:
LaValley, Brian E wrote:
I have a Fedora Core 3 amanda server. I have specified an nfs mounted
directory for one of the holding disks. Does anyone know why amcheck
finds
much less space available on this drive than a command like 'df' does?
You need to explain a
, Brian E
Cc: Amanda (E-mail)
Subject: Re: Holding disk size misread by amcheck
Paul Bijnens wrote:
LaValley, Brian E wrote:
I have a Fedora Core 3 amanda server. I have specified an nfs mounted
directory for one of the holding disks. Does anyone know why amcheck
finds
much less space available
LaValley, Brian E wrote:
Good point, my tape drive maximum sustained data transfer rate is 60 MBytes
per second on a Gigabit ethernet network. Is that too slow?
Maybe. Maybe not.
Those modern drives sometimes (usually) slow down their motors when
the bytes do not flow in fast enough, so that
I have a Fedora Core 3 amanda server. I have specified an nfs mounted
directory for one of the holding disks. Does anyone know why amcheck finds
much less space available on this drive than a command like 'df' does?
13 matches
Mail list logo
