Re: Holding disk size misread by amcheck

LaValley, Brian E wrote: I have a Fedora Core 3 amanda server. I have specified an nfs mounted directory for one of the holding disks. Does anyone know why amcheck finds much less space available on this drive than a command like 'df' does? You need to explain a little more. amcheck checks

Re: Holding disk size misread by amcheck

Paul Bijnens wrote: LaValley, Brian E wrote: I have a Fedora Core 3 amanda server. I have specified an nfs mounted directory for one of the holding disks. Does anyone know why amcheck finds much less space available on this drive than a command like 'df' does? You need to explain a

RE: Holding disk size misread by amcheck

, Brian E Cc: Amanda (E-mail) Subject: Re: Holding disk size misread by amcheck Paul Bijnens wrote: LaValley, Brian E wrote: I have a Fedora Core 3 amanda server. I have specified an nfs mounted directory for one of the holding disks. Does anyone know why amcheck finds much less space available

Re: Holding disk size misread by amcheck

LaValley, Brian E wrote: Good point, my tape drive maximum sustained data transfer rate is 60 MBytes per second on a Gigabit ethernet network. Is that too slow? Maybe. Maybe not. Those modern drives sometimes (usually) slow down their motors when the bytes do not flow in fast enough, so that

Holding disk size misread by amcheck

I have a Fedora Core 3 amanda server. I have specified an nfs mounted directory for one of the holding disks. Does anyone know why amcheck finds much less space available on this drive than a command like 'df' does?