Vicki Stanfield wrote:
On Mon, 2005-02-14 at 12:07 -0500, Jon LaBadie wrote:
I don't think chg-multi is used by a large number of installations.
I could certainly be wrong there. But if correct, I would not be
at all surprised that you may be wringing out a few sticky points.
(aka defects, less po
On Mon, 2005-02-14 at 12:07 -0500, Jon LaBadie wrote:
> Vicki,
> just an off-list comment.
>
> I don't think chg-multi is used by a large number of installations.
> I could certainly be wrong there. But if correct, I would not be
> at all surprised that you may be wringing out a few sticky points
Vicki Stanfield wrote:
I am using chg-multi with two tape drives. Sometimes my backups only
require one tape, other times both. After the weekend, I use amtape
current to determine which tape drive is current and put the first of
the two tapes asked for by amcheck in it. It doesn't always seem,
how
I am using chg-multi with two tape drives. Sometimes my backups only
require one tape, other times both. After the weekend, I use amtape
current to determine which tape drive is current and put the first of
the two tapes asked for by amcheck in it. It doesn't always seem,
however, that amanda is wr
