Hi Paul!
Paul Bijnens wrote:
...
The problem here is that when you had a real tape error, and then try
to flush o a new tape, then amanda refuses to put that one tape, because
it got an error last time? Not good. So how you do see if you got
a real error or just EOT. Explain me, because I s
Hi Paul!
Paul Bijnens wrote:
On 2006-02-23 14:18, Peter Mueller wrote:
Did you specify "taperalgo largestfit" in the amanda.conf? Or any
other?
I will check that, probably not, because I dont remember this
parameter.
Is was missing, which means "first" - I changed this to "smallest
On Thu, Feb 23, 2006 at 02:31:06PM +0100, Paul Bijnens enlightened us:
> >Paul Bijnens wrote:
> >>When there is only one image to choose from, Amanda will take that one,
> >>even if it will probably not fit. Changing that will make many other
> >>users of Amanda unhappy, e.g. those using hardware
On 2006-02-23 14:18, Peter Mueller wrote:
Did you specify "taperalgo largestfit" in the amanda.conf? Or any other?
I will check that, probably not, because I dont remember this parameter.
Is was missing, which means "first" - I changed this to "smallest" to
give the
2rd and 3rd level ima
On 2006-02-23 14:03, Peter Mueller wrote:
Paul Bijnens wrote:
When there is only one image to choose from, Amanda will take that one,
even if it will probably not fit. Changing that will make many other
users of Amanda unhappy, e.g. those using hardware compression because
their tape length is
Hi again!
Did you specify "taperalgo largestfit" in the amanda.conf? Or any other?
I will check that, probably not, because I dont remember this parameter.
Is was missing, which means "first" - I changed this to "smallest" to
give the
2rd and 3rd level images a chance to get thru ..
I t
Hi Paul!
Thanks for the answer!
Paul Bijnens wrote:
... What version of amanda is that?
Amanda-2.4.4p3
Did you specify "taperalgo largestfit" in the amanda.conf? Or any other?
I will check that, probably not, because I dont remember this parameter.
How many "runtapes" do you have?
On 2006-02-23 11:05, Peter Mueller wrote:
It happened again, that a "disk" grew over the lenght of a tape, and
so its backup got stuck on the holding disk.
And as it is all the time it happened when i was out of office
for some days...
I knew its my concern as the sysadmin to split it into sma
Hi!
It happened again, that a "disk" grew over the lenght of a tape, and
so its backup got stuck on the holding disk.
And as it is all the time it happened when i was out of office
for some days...
I knew its my concern as the sysadmin to split it into smaller
pieces ...
But it would be "nice
