Is this OK? "Ignoring cruft file"

Hi all, I added a 'big' disk to my disklist yesterday. About 8G. Flushing the files from the holding disk results in NOTES: amflush: beosrv-1._redhat.0.2: ignoring cruft file. amflush: beosrv-1._redhat.0.3: ignoring cruft file. taper: tape xic03 kb 13511296 fm 58 [OK] Should I worry abou

Re: Is this OK? "Ignoring cruft file"

On Thu, Aug 15, 2002 at 11:47:24AM +0200, Edwin Hakkennes wrote: > Hi all, > > I added a 'big' disk to my disklist yesterday. About 8G. > Flushing the files from the holding disk results in > > NOTES: > amflush: beosrv-1._redhat.0.2: ignoring cruft file. > amflush: beosrv-1._redhat.0.3: ign

Re: Is this OK? "Ignoring cruft file"

--On Thursday, August 15, 2002 11:47:24 +0200 Edwin Hakkennes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi all, > > I added a 'big' disk to my disklist yesterday. About 8G. > Flushing the files from the holding disk results in > > NOTES: > amflush: beosrv-1._redhat.0.2: ignoring cruft file. > amflush: be

Re: Is this OK? "Ignoring cruft file"

On Thursday 15 August 2002 11:01, Frank Smith wrote: >--On Thursday, August 15, 2002 11:47:24 +0200 Edwin Hakkennes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I added a 'big' disk to my disklist yesterday. About 8G. >> Flushing the files from the holding disk results in >> >> NOTES: >> amflush

Re: Is this OK? "Ignoring cruft file"

--On Thursday, August 15, 2002 11:45:52 -0400 Gene Heskett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thursday 15 August 2002 11:01, Frank Smith wrote: >> --On Thursday, August 15, 2002 11:47:24 +0200 Edwin Hakkennes > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I added a 'big' disk to my disklist yes

Re: Is this OK? "Ignoring cruft file"

On Thursday 15 August 2002 12:55, Frank Smith wrote: I've been corrected Frank, seems I'd missed the key word 'set', my bad. Can I plead alzheimers, or failing that, just plain stupidity? Maybe thats what I get for trying to keep my reading speeds up as the years pile up. :-) -- Cheers, G