Hi,
Not really an Amanda question but I'll try anyway...
I can't get better than ~60MiBs to LTO4 tape when using amtapetype.
I tried 32k 1024k and 2048k, with and without hw compression enabled.
Any hints? I've added some info below. I can provide more upon request.
Note that tapeinfo reports h
Jean-Francois Malouin wrote:
Hi,
Not really an Amanda question but I'll try anyway...
I can't get better than ~60MiBs to LTO4 tape when using amtapetype.
I tried 32k 1024k and 2048k, with and without hw compression enabled.
Any hints? I've added some info below. I can provide more upon reque
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 11:27 AM, Jean-Francois
Malouin wrote:
> I can't get better than ~60MiBs to LTO4 tape when using amtapetype.
> I tried 32k 1024k and 2048k, with and without hw compression enabled.
> Any hints? I've added some info below. I can provide more upon request.
60 MiB/s is certain
* Dustin J. Mitchell [20090612 11:47]:
> On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 11:27 AM, Jean-Francois
> Malouin wrote:
> > I can't get better than ~60MiBs to LTO4 tape when using amtapetype.
> > I tried 32k 1024k and 2048k, with and without hw compression enabled.
> > Any hints? I've added some info below. I c
* Chris Hoogendyk [20090612 11:46]:
>
> Jean-Francois Malouin wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Not really an Amanda question but I'll try anyway...
>>
>> I can't get better than ~60MiBs to LTO4 tape when using amtapetype. I
>> tried 32k 1024k and 2048k, with and without hw compression enabled.
>> Any hints? I
