Re: Mac OS X Server problems w/ gzip

2000-11-16 Thread Kevin M. Myer
On Wed, 15 Nov 2000, Sandra Panesso wrote: > Hi Kevin > > I Want to know if you have tried to run amanda on Mac OS X Beta. If you did > please tell me how was it. My question is because I am testing to run amanda > on Mac OS X Beta but I found some problems when i tried to compiled it. I > use

Re: Mac OS X Server problems w/ gzip

2000-11-15 Thread Sandra Panesso
"Kevin M. Myer" wrote: > Hello, > > Awhile back, I had posted about problems I was having with using AMANDA > with Mac OS X Server. The problems I was seeing related to extremely long > backup times, in excess of 8 hours to backup only 400MB of > data. Apple has disabled ktrace debugging of the

Re: Mac OS X Server problems w/ gzip

2000-11-09 Thread Kevin M. Myer
On Thu, 9 Nov 2000, Mitch Collinsworth wrote: > Have you tried compress client fast yet or are you still doing client > best? Yes, actually, I had been using client fast for all my backups. Maybe I would do better with client best :) Still, the thing that irks me most about it is not that the

Re: Mac OS X Server problems w/ gzip

2000-11-09 Thread Mitch Collinsworth
> >... gzip is just really, really slow when used with AMANDA under Mac > >OS X Server. Command line issued tar/gzip pipes seem to work reasonably > >fast on the OS X Server. > > Well, if one of these boxes ever drops in my lap (and I have time), > I guess I can take a look at debugging this.

Re: Mac OS X Server problems w/ gzip

2000-11-09 Thread Mitch Collinsworth
On Thu, 9 Nov 2000, Kevin M. Myer wrote: > On Wed, 8 Nov 2000, Chris Karakas wrote: > > > When I first used AMANDA, I used it without compression. Then I upgraded > > the tape drivers (which used an inherend "block" compression, > > transparent to the user), the new ones did not support any inhe

Re: Mac OS X Server problems w/ gzip

2000-11-09 Thread John R. Jackson
>... gzip is just really, really slow when used with AMANDA under Mac >OS X Server. Command line issued tar/gzip pipes seem to work reasonably >fast on the OS X Server. Well, if one of these boxes ever drops in my lap (and I have time), I guess I can take a look at debugging this. Other than t

Re: Mac OS X Server problems w/ gzip

2000-11-09 Thread Kevin M. Myer
On Wed, 8 Nov 2000, Chris Karakas wrote: > When I first used AMANDA, I used it without compression. Then I upgraded > the tape drivers (which used an inherend "block" compression, > transparent to the user), the new ones did not support any inherent > compression, so I had to use the usual "clien

Re: Mac OS X Server problems w/ gzip

2000-11-08 Thread Chris Karakas
"Kevin M. Myer" wrote: > > Hello, > > Awhile back, I had posted about problems I was having with using AMANDA > with Mac OS X Server. The problems I was seeing related to extremely long > backup times, in excess of 8 hours to backup only 400MB of > data. Apple has disabled ktrace debugging of

Re: Mac OS X Server problems w/ gzip

2000-11-07 Thread Mitch Collinsworth
> Awhile back, I had posted about problems I was having with using AMANDA > with Mac OS X Server. The problems I was seeing related to extremely long > backup times, in excess of 8 hours to backup only 400MB of > data. Apple has disabled ktrace debugging of the kernel so there wasn't > much I co

Mac OS X Server problems w/ gzip

2000-11-07 Thread Kevin M. Myer
Hello, Awhile back, I had posted about problems I was having with using AMANDA with Mac OS X Server. The problems I was seeing related to extremely long backup times, in excess of 8 hours to backup only 400MB of data. Apple has disabled ktrace debugging of the kernel so there wasn't much I coul