On 2007-06-04 11:13, Marc Muehlfeld wrote:
> Cyrille Bollu schrieb:
>> It's probably just that your tape definition (that you created with
>> amtapetype) defines a smaller length than the actual tape length.
> Is there a way to get a more accurate result?
Note that not all the tapes are exactly th
Cyrille Bollu schrieb:
> It's probably just that your tape definition (that you created with
> amtapetype) defines a smaller length than the actual tape length.
Is there a way to get a more accurate result?
--
Marc Muehlfeld (Leitung Systemadministration)
Zentrum fuer Humangenetik und Laboratoriu
It's probably just that your tape definition (that you created with
amtapetype) defines a smaller length than the actual tape length.
Cyrille
[EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit sur 04/06/2007 10:43:50 :
> Hi,
>
> I'm using amanda now since almost 5 years. But I'm still sometimes get
> confused, when am
Hi,
I'm using amanda now since almost 5 years. But I'm still sometimes get
confused, when amanda tell me, that she filled some of my tapes with more
than 100% (not much, but its mostly 1-2% more):
KMS087D 3:4834919M 101.41116
I created the tapetype by myself using amtapetype,
