Hello,
I'm getting an error while running chg-zd-mtx: " cannot determine first
slot"
Does anyone have any ideia.
Best regards,
Luis
Hello,
I have a Tandberg LTO2 Superloader attached on an Adaptec 39160D and the
chg-scsi returns: amtape: could not load slot Can't: read MTE status
Example:
$amtape CAPCom update
amtape: scanning all 16 slots in tape-changer rack:
slot 0: date 20031211 label CAPCom01
amtape: could not load slot C
Hi, I'm an amanda newbie running it on a Solaris 8 server with a Sun
STORedge L9 tape drive and controller (that's actually a Quantum DLT
8000 tape drive coupled with HP Changer robotics).
The problem I have is with the tape changer, it seems that amcheck,
amtape and other programs don't under
On Mon, May 08, 2006 at 10:41:24AM +0200, Luis Rodrigues wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm getting an error while running chg-zd-mtx: " cannot determine first
> slot"
> Does anyone have any ideia.
>
what have you done to get to this point?
I have to assume you have installed some version of amanda.
have
2006/5/8, Luis Rodrigues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I'm getting an error while running chg-zd-mtx: " cannot determine first
slot"
Does anyone have any ideia.
When it happened to me, it was caused by incorrect permissions and
user:group for /dev/sg1 the generic SCSI device file for the changer.
I ha
Quoting Salvatore Enrico Indiogine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I have the same problem as Luis when i run amcheck
Amanda Tape Server Host Check
-
Holding disk /amanda/amandahold/test: 14245792 kB disk space
available, using 14245792 kB
amcheck-server: could not get changer
On Tue, May 09, 2006 at 10:33:01AM +0200, Stefan MARTEL wrote:
> Quoting Salvatore Enrico Indiogine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> I have the same problem as Luis when i run amcheck
> Amanda Tape Server Host Check
> -
> Holding disk /amanda/amandahold/test: 14245792 kB disk s
Quoting Jon LaBadie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Thanks for your answer
I had done all this manip but i still have a problem, now in the
/tmp/amanda/chg-zd-mtx.***.debug i have this message :
hg-zd-mtx: debug 1 pid 13467 ruid 1002 euid 1002: start at Tue May 9
16:39:54 2006
16:39:54 Using config fi
On Tue, May 09, 2006 at 04:47:10PM +0200, Stefan MARTEL wrote:
> Quoting Jon LaBadie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Thanks for your answer
>
> I had done all this manip but i still have a problem, now in the
> /tmp/amanda/chg-zd-mtx.***.debug i have this message :
>
> hg-zd-mtx: debug 1 pid 13467 ruid
On Tuesday 09 May 2006 11:06, Jon LaBadie wrote:
> > My autoloader is on /dev/st0 and tape are defined on /dev/nst0
>
> I don't think so.
> st0 and nst0 are the "same" device handled differenly on close.
The changer is probably on /dev/sg0 or /dev/sg1.
--
Wiki for Amanda documentation: http://wi
> From: Ian Turner
> Sent: 09 May 2006 16:54
>
> On Tuesday 09 May 2006 11:06, Jon LaBadie wrote:
> > > My autoloader is on /dev/st0 and tape are defined on /dev/nst0
> >
> > I don't think so.
> > st0 and nst0 are the "same" device handled differenly on close.
>
> The changer is probably on /dev/
Quoting Ian Turner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Tuesday 09 May 2006 11:06, Jon LaBadie wrote:
> My autoloader is on /dev/st0 and tape are defined on /dev/nst0
I don't think so.
st0 and nst0 are the "same" device handled differenly on close.
The changer is probably on /dev/sg0 or /dev/sg1.
--
Wiki
Quoting Ian Turner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Tuesday 09 May 2006 11:06, Jon LaBadie wrote:
> My autoloader is on /dev/st0 and tape are defined on /dev/nst0
I don't think so.
st0 and nst0 are the "same" device handled differenly on close.
The changer is probably on /dev/sg0 or /dev/sg1.
--
Wiki
Quoting Paul Haldane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
From: Ian Turner
Sent: 09 May 2006 16:54
On Tuesday 09 May 2006 11:06, Jon LaBadie wrote:
> > My autoloader is on /dev/st0 and tape are defined on /dev/nst0
>
> I don't think so.
> st0 and nst0 are the "same" device handled differenly on close.
The cha
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 09:04:30AM +0200, Stefan MARTEL wrote:
> Quoting Ian Turner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> >On Tuesday 09 May 2006 11:06, Jon LaBadie wrote:
> >>> My autoloader is on /dev/st0 and tape are defined on /dev/nst0
> >>
> >>I don't think so.
> >>st0 and nst0 are the "same" device hand
Jon LaBadie schrieb:
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 09:04:30AM +0200, Stefan MARTEL wrote:
Quoting Ian Turner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Tuesday 09 May 2006 11:06, Jon LaBadie wrote:
My autoloader is on /dev/st0 and tape are defined on /dev/nst0
I don't think so.
st0 and nst0 are the "same" device han
Quoting Jon LaBadie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 09:04:30AM +0200, Stefan MARTEL wrote:
Quoting Ian Turner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>On Tuesday 09 May 2006 11:06, Jon LaBadie wrote:
>>> My autoloader is on /dev/st0 and tape are defined on /dev/nst0
>>
>>I don't think so.
>>st0 and
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 02:50:29PM +0200, Stefan MARTEL wrote:
>
> (Sorry for my english but i'am french ;-)
There's your problem :)
--
Jon H. LaBadie [EMAIL PROTECTED]
JG Computing
4455 Province Line Road(609) 252-0159
Princeton, NJ 08540-4322 (609) 683-7220 (
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 02:50:29PM +0200, Stefan MARTEL wrote:
> >
> > # tapeinfo -f /dev/sg0
> > Product Type: Tape Drive
> > Vendor ID: 'HP '
> > Product ID: 'C1557A '
...
> >
> > # tapeinfo -f /dev/sg1
> > Product Type: Medium Changer
> > Vendor ID: 'HP '
> > Product I
Thomas Corell:
>I'm running Linux with a 1.6.1 kernel, and amanda 2.4.4p2.
Do you mean kernel 2.6.1? If so, that's somewhat out on the bleeding
edge and it's still gonna have some kinks in it. Can you drop it
back to a 2.4 kernel & test?
-
On Monday 19 January 2004 12:29, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Thomas Corell:
>>I'm running Linux with a 1.6.1 kernel, and amanda 2.4.4p2.
>
>Do you mean kernel 2.6.1? If so, that's somewhat out on the bleeding
>edge and it's still gonna have some kinks in it. Can you drop it
>back to a 2.4 kernel & te
Gene Heskett :
>On Monday 19 January 2004 12:29, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>Thomas Corell:
>>>I'm running Linux with a 1.6.1 kernel, and amanda 2.4.4p2.
>>
>>Do you mean kernel 2.6.1? If so, that's somewhat out on the bleeding
>>edge and it's still gonna have some kinks in it. Can you drop it
>>ba
On Monday 19 January 2004 14:17, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Gene Heskett :
>>On Monday 19 January 2004 12:29, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>>Thomas Corell:
I'm running Linux with a 1.6.1 kernel, and amanda 2.4.4p2.
>>>
>>>Do you mean kernel 2.6.1? If so, that's somewhat out on the
>>> bleeding edge
Gene Heskett wrote:
On Monday 19 January 2004 14:17, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gene Heskett :
On Monday 19 January 2004 12:29, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thomas Corell:
I'm running Linux with a 1.6.1 kernel, and amanda 2.4.4p2.
Do you mean kernel 2.6.1? If so, that's somewhat out on the
bleeding e
>Hi, I'm an amanda newbie running it on ...
What version of Amanda?
>amcheck-server: slot : could not read result from
>"/usr/local/libexec/chg-zd-mtx"
What happens if you do this (as the Amanda user):
cd
/usr/local/libexec/chg-zd-mtx -reset
/usr/local/libexec/chg-zd-mtx -slot 4
Depen
> What version of Amanda?
Version 2.4.2p2
> What happens if you do this (as the Amanda user):
>
> cd
> /usr/local/libexec/chg-zd-mtx -reset
> /usr/local/libexec/chg-zd-mtx -slot 4
Doesn't work either... :(
I've been doing some debugging following the chg-zd-mtx script line by
line, an
First of all, thanks for answering.
> I used chg-scsi-solaris.conf:
I didn't have that file. Where should it be created, in the same
directory as amanda.conf?
After creating this file with the correct paths and modifying my
amanda.conf file it gave me the following error:
amcheck-server: coul
>> What happens if you do this (as the Amanda user):
>>...
>Doesn't work either... :(
I didn't figure it would :-). I wanted to see the output to try and
figure out why not.
However, sounds like you've already worked things out.
>I've been doing some debugging following the chg-zd-mtx script
>> I guess I should have a
>> list of all my labels and a barcode code for each label, but I don't
>> know how to generate that or if I have to do it manually.
>
> First, zap that file to zero length (cp /dev/null ...). Then, I
> **think**
> you should be able to do "amtape update" (as the Aman
I am trying a test amrestore of some files after amanda has run for a
bit on a RedHat 8.0 system with an HP DDS-3 6-tape changer. The backups
are fine, as are the automatic tape changes; I can get at all of my
backups manually with dd and tar. However, amrestore is not happy.
The details: I'm
On Thu, Mar 20, 2003 at 05:30:14PM -0800, Stephen Walton wrote:
> I am trying a test amrestore of some files after amanda has run for a
> bit on a RedHat 8.0 system with an HP DDS-3 6-tape changer. The backups
> are fine, as are the automatic tape changes; I can get at all of my
> backups manuall
On Fri, 21 Mar 2003, Jon LaBadie wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 20, 2003 at 05:30:14PM -0800, Stephen Walton wrote:
> > I am trying a test amrestore of some files after amanda has run for a
> > bit on a RedHat 8.0 system with an HP DDS-3 6-tape changer. The backups
> > are fine, as are the automatic tape
32 matches
Mail list logo
