Lars Segerlund schrieb:
have you checked the options for parrallell dumpers ?
Yes i have 4.
You should be able to have multiple connections to clients, and your
time seem's looong !
We have just one client (the file server) and the backup server.
And the interface-values and bandwith-value
dalton on Fri 24/01 09:59 +0100:
> But we have a 100mbit LAN, so there should be 10240 kbps, thats right?
just being picky,
$ bc -ql
100 * (2^10)^2 / 8 / 2^10
12800.
:) of course if you actually hit that wire speed I'll be amazed.
On Friday 24 January 2003 05:35, Scott Mcdermott wrote:
>dalton on Fri 24/01 09:59 +0100:
>> But we have a 100mbit LAN, so there should be 10240 kbps, thats
>> right?
>
>just being picky,
>
>$ bc -ql
>100 * (2^10)^2 / 8 / 2^10
>12800.
>
>:) of course if you actually hit that wir
Gene Heskett on Fri 24/01 08:34 -0500:
> > > But we have a 100mbit LAN, so there should be 10240 kbps, thats
> > > right?
> >
> > $ bc -ql
> > 100 * (2^10)^2 / 8 / 2^10
> > 12800.
>
> I don't believe this is quite correct. Thats a serial protocol, and
> AFAIK it still uses star
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 24, 2003 7:35 AM
To: Scott Mcdermott; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: speed of amdump
On Friday 24 January 2003 05:35, Scott Mcdermott wrote:
>dalton on Fri 24/01 09:59 +0100:
>> But we have a 100mbit LAN, so there should be 10240 kbps, thats
On Fri, Jan 24, 2003 at 09:59:48AM +0100, dalton wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the speed of our hp surestore seems to be ok, but the amdump takes too much
> time (6 hours for 23 GB, we want to use now client fast compression).
>
> So we have a suspicion (someone just has installed it, but this person is
> n
>the speed of our hp surestore seems to be ok, but the amdump takes too
>much time (6 hours for 23 GB, we want to use now client fast
>compression).
How fast can you get data off of your disks? If that 23G is one
filesystem, you might consider splitting it up so that Amanda can
schedule it more
>the speed of our hp surestore seems to be ok, but the amdump takes too much ti
>me
> (6 hours for 23 GB, we want to use now client fast compression).
There are several areas that can affect speed, and it's important to
understand the flow of data through Amanda to see where the potential
bottle
On Fri, Jan 24, 2003 at 08:31:19AM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> And if any of us can RELIABLY exceed 30 percent usage on
> an Ethernet network, I want to see it.
Well, one of my amanda clients does two dumps in parallel over 100BaseT
at >=3MB/s dumper rate (each) every single night. Does th
