On Monday 13 January 2003 02:36, Nitesh Kumar A. wrote:
>Hai Jon:
>
>I haven't compared AMANDA with other backup utilities extensively.
>
>The main reason is - People in our university are using ADSM. I
> have been using AMANDA for sometime on my machine. I need to have
> a nice reason for my unive
> >> May I know some of the reasons why AMANDA edges over other traditional
> >> Unix backup utilities.
> >
> > stable
> > does what it claims
> > source available
> > well supported
> > good, unique scheduling module
> > networked
> > scales well from a single system to moderatly large installati
Hai Jon:
I haven't compared AMANDA with other backup utilities extensively.
The main reason is - People in our university are using ADSM. I have been
using AMANDA for sometime on my machine. I need to have a nice reason for
my university for switching over to AMANDA.
Few nice reasons could be
--On Monday, January 13, 2003 01:56:16 -0500 Jon LaBadie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 13, 2003 at 10:36:33AM +0530, Nitesh Kumar A. wrote:
>>
>> I am yet to understand the advantages of AMANDA over other backup
>> utilities like ADSM, etc other than AMANDA being a freebie?
>>
>> May
On Mon, Jan 13, 2003 at 10:36:33AM +0530, Nitesh Kumar A. wrote:
>
> I am yet to understand the advantages of AMANDA over other backup
> utilities like ADSM, etc other than AMANDA being a freebie?
>
> May I know some of the reasons why AMANDA edges over other traditional
> Unix backup utilities.
