On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 06:04:23PM -0500, Brian G. Peterson wrote:
> amandates botch: hda6 lev 0: new dumpdate 1056177662 old 1056177943
> sendbackup-gnutar: time 0.022: doing level 0 dump from date: 1970-01-01
> 0:00:00 GMT
> sendbackup: time 0.024: spawning /usr/lib/amanda/runtar in pipeline
> s
> On Wednesday 25 June 2003 18:37, Brian G. Peterson wrote:
> >I got one response telling me to make sure that the tar was gnu tar.
> > All that checked out. Any other ideas? I'm really stuck here...
>
> Perchance have you got another older version of tar that's found first
> in the $PATH? Do a
On Wednesday 25 June 2003 18:37, Brian G. Peterson wrote:
>I got one response telling me to make sure that the tar was gnu tar.
> All that checked out. Any other ideas? I'm really stuck here...
Perchance have you got another older version of tar thats found first
in the $PATH? Do a 'which tar
Thanks. - Brian
Joshua Baker-LePain asks:
> What's in the /tmp/amanda/sendbackup*debug on the client corresponding to
> the failing dump?
Here is the debug output typical of one of the failed hdb1 dumps:
sendbackup.20030623143153.debug:
sendbackup: debug 1 pid 6582 ruid 33 euid 33: start at Mon
On Wed, 25 Jun 2003 at 5:37pm, Brian G. Peterson wrote
> I got one response telling me to make sure that the tar was gnu tar. All
> that checked out. Any other ideas? I'm really stuck here...
What's in the /tmp/amanda/sendbackup*debug on the client corresponding to
the failing dump?
--
Josh
I got one response telling me to make sure that the tar was gnu tar. All
that checked out. Any other ideas? I'm really stuck here...
Many Thanks,
-Brian Peterson
-Original Message-
From: Brian G. Peterson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2003 8:28 AM
I am working o
