Strange amdump

2001-04-08 Thread C Scott
Can anyone think of any reason why I can only get one backup on a tape. The tape is only 38% used, but the amdump report (email) says that next tape expected is a new tape. If amdump is run again, it reports that amflush must be used because it can't overwrite the active tape. There is

Re: Strange amdump

2001-04-08 Thread Marty Shannon, RHCE
C Scott wrote: Can anyone think of any reason why I can only get one backup on a tape. The tape is only 38% used, but the amdump report (email) says that next tape expected is a new tape. If amdump is run again, it reports that amflush must be used because it can't overwrite the

Re: Strange amdump

2001-04-08 Thread John R. Jackson
Can anyone think of any reason why I can only get one backup on a tape. The tape is only 38% used, but the amdump report (email) says that next tape expected is a new tape. If amdump is run again, it reports that amflush must be used because it can't overwrite the active tape. There is

Re: Strange amdump

2001-04-08 Thread C Scott
So a backup strategy of a 1 month cycle containing 1 full back up followed by incrementals on the same tape is impossible, and unreliable? I have 8 tapes, and would like to spread them out as much as possible so that I will have a long time span available on backup. Can you recommend a

Re: Strange amdump

2001-04-08 Thread John R. Jackson
So a backup strategy of a 1 month cycle containing 1 full back up followed by incrementals on the same tape is impossible, and unreliable? First of all, Amanda won't run that way. Amanda will spread the full dumps throughout the dump cycle. With the current versions of Amanda, it is not