Re: The spanning patch

John Stange <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Whacking now, expect stuff in the next week or so... Awaiting results... :-) -- Bruce S. Skinner Defence R&D Canada - Atlantic 9 Grove St. P.O. Box 1012 Dartmouth NS CA

Re: The spanning patch

> > I haven't looked at amverify yet at all (you're the first person who's > > tried to use it with the patch). I'll take a whack at it once some regular > > work stuff is off my plate. > > When you've had your "whack at it" let me know and I'll give it a run as > well. Whacking now, expect stuf

Re: The spanning patch

Hello John, John Stange <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I haven't looked at amverify yet at all (you're the first person who's tried > to > use it with the patch). I'll take a whack at it once some regular work stuff > is off my plate. When you've had your "whack at it" let me know and I'll give

Re: The spanning patch

> I'm afraid that the results of the spanning patch by John > Stange (Hi John) are a bit less than optimum in some regards. > > 1: The printed reports as to whats on which tape are at quite > large odds with the results of doing a directory on that vtape. > The two hosts ar

The spanning patch

Hi everybody; I'm afraid that the results of the spanning patch by John Stange (Hi John) are a bit less than optimum in some regards. 1: The printed reports as to whats on which tape are at quite large odds with the results of doing a directory on that vtape. The two hosts are coyote and