Re: Version 2.5.0: Have incronly/skip-fill issues been addressed

2006-06-13 Thread Toralf Lund
Jon LaBadie wrote: On Tue, Jun 13, 2006 at 11:46:20AM +0200, Paul Bijnens wrote: I'm still finding out a use for "skip-full". It seems to be a weird option: when the planner had decided to make a full dump, then in the real run it is skipped. That would mean that you have to be carefully

Re: Version 2.5.0: Have incronly/skip-fill issues been addressed

2006-06-13 Thread Paul Bijnens
On 2006-06-13 16:28, Jon LaBadie wrote: On Tue, Jun 13, 2006 at 11:46:20AM +0200, Paul Bijnens wrote: I'm still finding out a use for "skip-full". It seems to be a weird option: when the planner had decided to make a full dump, then in the real run it is skipped. That would mean that you have

Re: Version 2.5.0: Have incronly/skip-fill issues been addressed

2006-06-13 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Tue, Jun 13, 2006 at 11:46:20AM +0200, Paul Bijnens wrote: > > I'm still finding out a use for "skip-full". It seems to be a weird > option: when the planner had decided to make a full dump, then in > the real run it is skipped. That would mean that you have to be > carefully reading the re

Re: Version 2.5.0: Have incronly/skip-fill issues been addressed

2006-06-13 Thread Paul Bijnens
On 2006-06-13 11:21, Toralf Lund wrote: Another question related to amanda 2.5: Does anyone know if the issues with "skip-full" and/or "strategy incronly" been addressed? In the past, neither "strategy incronly" nor "skip-full" have worked quite as expected. I'm afraid I can't remember the fu

Version 2.5.0: Have incronly/skip-fill issues been addressed

2006-06-13 Thread Toralf Lund
Another question related to amanda 2.5: Does anyone know if the issues with "skip-full" and/or "strategy incronly" been addressed? In the past, neither "strategy incronly" nor "skip-full" have worked quite as expected. I'm afraid I can't remember the full details, but one problem I've had, was