Jon LaBadie wrote:
On Tue, Jun 13, 2006 at 11:46:20AM +0200, Paul Bijnens wrote:
I'm still finding out a use for "skip-full". It seems to be a weird
option: when the planner had decided to make a full dump, then in
the real run it is skipped. That would mean that you have to be
carefully
On 2006-06-13 16:28, Jon LaBadie wrote:
On Tue, Jun 13, 2006 at 11:46:20AM +0200, Paul Bijnens wrote:
I'm still finding out a use for "skip-full". It seems to be a weird
option: when the planner had decided to make a full dump, then in
the real run it is skipped. That would mean that you have
On Tue, Jun 13, 2006 at 11:46:20AM +0200, Paul Bijnens wrote:
>
> I'm still finding out a use for "skip-full". It seems to be a weird
> option: when the planner had decided to make a full dump, then in
> the real run it is skipped. That would mean that you have to be
> carefully reading the re
On 2006-06-13 11:21, Toralf Lund wrote:
Another question related to amanda 2.5:
Does anyone know if the issues with "skip-full" and/or "strategy
incronly" been addressed? In the past, neither "strategy incronly" nor
"skip-full" have worked quite as expected. I'm afraid I can't remember
the fu
Another question related to amanda 2.5:
Does anyone know if the issues with "skip-full" and/or "strategy
incronly" been addressed? In the past, neither "strategy incronly" nor
"skip-full" have worked quite as expected. I'm afraid I can't remember
the full details, but one problem I've had, was