Amanda Problems after server upgrade

2004-03-30 Thread keith
Title: Message Hi All: I had amanda working perfectly on our server until I installed Readhat Enterprise ES. I copied all of my amanda config files, but something isn't working now and I'm not certain where to look. I get this reported in my mail (mydomain is substituted for our domain

Re: Amanda Problems after server upgrade

2004-03-30 Thread Joshua Baker-LePain
On Tue, 30 Mar 2004 at 9:05am, keith wrote I had amanda working perfectly on our server until I installed Readhat Enterprise ES. I copied all of my amanda config files, but something isn't working now and I'm not certain where to look. I get this reported in my mail (mydomain is

amanda problems with xinetd and ipv6

2002-06-27 Thread Ron Snyder
I came across some of your posts in the amanda archives regarding the problem you're having and I think I might have a clue about it. We've been having the same problem recently, and I think it corresponds to our enabling ipv6 on the machine in question. The startup script (at least in redhat)

amanda problems

2001-07-05 Thread Sandra Panesso
Hi everybody: I upgrade my amanda beta version to Amanda 2.4.2p2 everything was fine when I compiled this version but when I tried to test using amcheck I got this error amcheck-server: could not get changer info: badly formed result from changer: /usr/local/libexec/chg-zd-mtx: [: -eq:

Re: amanda problems

2001-07-05 Thread John R. Jackson
I upgrade my amanda beta version to Amanda 2.4.2p2 ... amcheck-server: could not get changer info: badly formed result from changer: /usr/local/libexec/chg-zd-mtx: [: -eq: unary operator expected Someone else posted a problem like this a few days ago. As I recall, it was a problem in their

amanda Problems

2001-06-18 Thread Sandra Panesso
Hi everybody: I posted few days ago a question (big one), but I have not received any answer so I don't know if I was clear or not (my english) so I am trying to understand my problem by myself. but anyway I need to ask you something to verify that everything is ok with my configuration. I have

Re: amanda problems

2001-04-03 Thread Alexandre Oliva
On Apr 2, 2001, Sandra Panesso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ? gtar: time_t value 18446744071597657311 too large (max=68719476735) I used to get errors like this with GNU tar 1.13. If that's the one you're using, don't. Use GNU tar 1.13.17 or newer, or go back to 1.12 plus the patch somewhere in

Re: amanda problems

2001-04-02 Thread John R. Jackson
? gtar: time_t value 18446744071597657311 too large (max=68719476735) ... Last night I got this error but I' am not sure what does it mean? It means you have several files out there with "negative" times in them. For instance, 18446744071597657311 translates to 0x,0x821f0cdf. That, in

amanda problems

2001-03-20 Thread Sandra Panesso
HI everybody: I have a machine with Mac OS X that i am trying to backup for level 4 but i get an error " Data write: File too large". The first time that I included this machine into the disklist everything was fine, I could backup but the problem was when I tried to backup all the area

amanda problems

2001-02-26 Thread Paolo Supino
Hi I have a problem compiling amanda on a machine (read my previous post). To overcome it. I compiled amanda on a machine that doesn't have plan9 installed. After a successful compile I tarred the file and moved it to the destination install machine and ran 'make install'. Now when I run

Re: amanda problems

2001-02-26 Thread John R. Jackson
... Now when I run amcheck {config} from the server, it returns the error: "moscow: [can not execute /usr/local/libexec/runtar: Permission denied]". The permissions on the file are: "-rwsr-x--- 1 root backup 47072 Feb 26 11:45 /usr/local/libexec/runtar " which are exactly the same as