Re: amcheck not saying expecting tapeno. or a new tape

2004-11-06 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Sat, Nov 06, 2004 at 05:14:57AM +, Gavin Henry wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I suspect you have only done one backup, thus only previously used one tape. You think there is an order to the tapes, 2 follows 1 etc. Amanda could care less what new tape it

Re: amcheck not saying expecting tapeno. or a new tape

2004-11-06 Thread Gavin Henry
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Saturday 06 Nov 2004 17:35, Jon LaBadie wrote: On Sat, Nov 06, 2004 at 05:14:57AM +, Gavin Henry wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I suspect you have only done one backup, thus only previously used one tape.

Re: amcheck not saying expecting tapeno. or a new tape

2004-11-06 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Sat, Nov 06, 2004 at 08:44:39PM +, Gavin Henry wrote: On Saturday 06 Nov 2004 17:35, Jon LaBadie wrote: So the correct answer, whether you like it or not, is a new tape labelled, but unused previously. So, amcheck saying new tape is correct, because you have not yet written to

Re: amcheck not saying expecting tapeno. or a new tape

2004-11-06 Thread Gavin Henry
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Saturday 06 Nov 2004 22:26, Jon LaBadie wrote: On Sat, Nov 06, 2004 at 08:44:39PM +, Gavin Henry wrote: On Saturday 06 Nov 2004 17:35, Jon LaBadie wrote: So the correct answer, whether you like it or not, is a new tape labelled, but

Re: amcheck not saying expecting tapeno. or a new tape

2004-11-06 Thread Gene Heskett
On Saturday 06 November 2004 17:40, Gavin Henry wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Saturday 06 Nov 2004 22:26, Jon LaBadie wrote: On Sat, Nov 06, 2004 at 08:44:39PM +, Gavin Henry wrote: On Saturday 06 Nov 2004 17:35, Jon LaBadie wrote: So the correct answer,

amcheck not saying expecting tapeno. or a new tape

2004-11-05 Thread Gavin Henry
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dear all, After compiling by hand and patching amcheck.c to include our signature, all tests ran fine, backup work to tape etc, but a strange problem with amcheck: quote Appserv Tape Server Host Check - - Holding

Re: amcheck not saying expecting tapeno. or a new tape

2004-11-05 Thread Jon LaBadie
It is really best to post to only ONE of the -users or -hackers lists. Decide if it is about the code of amanda, then submit to -hackers. For the overwhelming majority of posts, they concern usage of amanda and should go to -users. On Fri, Nov 05, 2004 at 08:05:48PM +, Gavin Henry wrote:

Re: amcheck not saying expecting tapeno. or a new tape

2004-11-05 Thread Mitch Collinsworth
Would people please stop cross-posting between -users and -hackers. If your message is about using amanda, send it to -users. If it's about the source, send it to -hackers. Don't mean to single out Gavin here. This has happened several times recently, each then multiplied by all the followups.

Re: amcheck not saying expecting tapeno. or a new tape

2004-11-05 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Fri, Nov 05, 2004 at 03:24:40PM -0500, Jon LaBadie wrote: It is really best to post to only ONE of the -users or -hackers lists. Decide if it is about the code of amanda, then submit to -hackers. For the overwhelming majority of posts, they concern usage of amanda and should go to

Re: amcheck not saying expecting tapeno. or a new tape

2004-11-05 Thread Gavin Henry
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Friday 05 Nov 2004 20:24, Jon LaBadie wrote: It is really best to post to only ONE of the -users or -hackers lists. Decide if it is about the code of amanda, then submit to -hackers. For the overwhelming majority of posts, they concern usage

Re: amcheck not saying expecting tapeno. or a new tape

2004-11-05 Thread Gavin Henry
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Friday 05 Nov 2004 20:42, you wrote: Would people please stop cross-posting between -users and -hackers. If your message is about using amanda, send it to -users. If it's about the source, send it to -hackers. Again, sorry. I thought it was

Re: amcheck not saying expecting tapeno. or a new tape

2004-11-05 Thread Stefan G. Weichinger
Hi, Jon, on Freitag, 05. November 2004 at 22:09 you wrote to amanda-users: JL On Fri, Nov 05, 2004 at 03:24:40PM -0500, Jon LaBadie wrote: It is really best to post to only ONE of the -users or -hackers lists. Decide if it is about the code of amanda, then submit to -hackers. For the

Re: amcheck not saying expecting tapeno. or a new tape

2004-11-05 Thread Gavin Henry
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 You think there is an order to the tapes, 2 follows 1 etc. Amanda could care less what new tape it writes to next. If you put in tape3 next, amanda's order will have 3 following 1 in the future. If you labelstr allows it (tape.*) amanda will

Re: amcheck not saying expecting tapeno. or a new tape

2004-11-05 Thread Gavin Henry
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I suspect you have only done one backup, thus only previously used one tape. You think there is an order to the tapes, 2 follows 1 etc. Amanda could care less what new tape it writes to next. If you put in tape3 next, amanda's order will have