amrecover does not change the tape by itself.
You have to keep in mind that the chg-disk emulates a robotic with the hard drive.
And amrecover (certainly due to security reasons that I won't discuss here) does not
automatically search the correct tape in the robot: the tape(s) you want to use
Hi
That s a bit strange.
my amrecover can change tape and find the good.
you have to put the following parameter in amanda.conf
amrecover_changer /dev/null
and to launch amrecover in that way
amrecover -d /dev/null
then the tape server will use the changer specified in the amanda.conf
file
Hi, Eric,
on Montag, 26. Jänner 2004 at 21:11 you wrote to amanda-users:
ED Hi
ED That s a bit strange.
ED my amrecover can change tape and find the good.
ED you have to put the following parameter in amanda.conf
ED amrecover_changer /dev/null
ED and to launch amrecover in that way
ED amrecover
Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
Hi, Eric,
on Montag, 26. Jänner 2004 at 21:11 you wrote to amanda-users:
ED That s a bit strange.
ED my amrecover can change tape and find the good.
ED you have to put the following parameter in amanda.conf
ED amrecover_changer /dev/null
ED and to launch amrecover in
Hi, Paul,
on Montag, 26. Jänner 2004 at 22:54 you wrote to amanda-users:
PB The way it is intended, and the way it works too, is that you
PB specify a string in amanda.conf with the directive
PB amrecover_changer thestring
PB and you instruct amrecover to use the changer with the command
Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
Could you point us to the spot where this is explained in the docs?
I suppose there is some reason to make this function with ANY string.
From man amanda:
amrecover_changer string
Default: . Amrecover will use the changer if you use settape
STRING and
Hi, Paul Bijnens,
on Montag, 26. Jänner 2004 at 23:32 you wrote to amanda-users:
PB From man amanda:
PB From man amrecover:
Yeah.
Silly me did not get that right.
PB And you can get silly and name your newborn son Sue and your
PB changer device /dev/null.
I will think about that ;)
--
Hi!
I'm using amanda 2.4.4p2 on Redhat 8, with the file output driver
(i.e. writing to disk instead of tapes). The config is working great,
but using amrecover is a little clunky since the current tape slot
(directory) is usually set to the next available tape, and not the slot
required for
Hi, Marc,
on Mittwoch, 21. Jänner 2004 at 19:41 you wrote to amanda-users:
ML Hello,
ML I'm using amanda 2.4.4p2 on Redhat 8, with the file output driver
ML (i.e. writing to disk instead of tapes). The config is working great,
ML but using amrecover is a little clunky since the current tape
Stefan,
The settape command in amrecover is what I was looking for (thanks
Toomas!).
I'm using the chg-disk changer. Does amrecover use the changer script?
And would it be possible to modify the script to choose the correct
slot?
Marc.
On Thu, 2004-01-22 at 03:19, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
Hi, Marc,
on Donnerstag, 22. Jänner 2004 at 16:59 you wrote to amanda-users:
ML I'm using the chg-disk changer. Does amrecover use the changer script?
Good question. There is the parameter amrecover_changer which
explicitly sets the changer used. Maybe you try to set this in your
conf.
ML And
Stefan,
The settape section of the man page for amrecover says:
settape [[server]:][tapedev|default]
If you want amrecover to use your changer, the tapedev must be equal
to the amrecover_changer setting on the server.
I used this setting in amanda.conf:
amrecover_changer
Hello,
I'm using amanda 2.4.4p2 on Redhat 8, with the file output driver
(i.e. writing to disk instead of tapes). The config is working great,
but using amrecover is a little clunky since the current tape slot
(directory) is usually set to the next available tape, and not the slot
required for
13 matches
Mail list logo